Bug 2176168
| Summary: | python-recordclass fails to build with Python 3.12: error: PyLongObject {aka struct _longobject} has no member named ob_digit | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Tomáš Hrnčiar <thrnciar> |
| Component: | python-recordclass | Assignee: | Davide Cavalca <davide> |
| Status: | CLOSED ERRATA | QA Contact: | |
| Severity: | unspecified | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | unspecified | ||
| Version: | rawhide | CC: | davide, mhroncok, thrnciar |
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||
| Target Release: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | Unspecified | ||
| OS: | Unspecified | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | python-recordclass-0.20-2.fc40 python-recordclass-0.20-2.fc39 | Doc Type: | If docs needed, set a value |
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2023-08-12 15:18:37 UTC | Type: | Bug |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
| Embargoed: | |||
| Bug Depends On: | |||
| Bug Blocks: | 2135404 | ||
FEDORA-2023-505832efb8 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 40. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2023-505832efb8 FEDORA-2023-505832efb8 has been pushed to the Fedora 40 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report. FEDORA-2023-50ff260d8a has been submitted as an update to Fedora 39. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2023-50ff260d8a FEDORA-2023-50ff260d8a has been pushed to the Fedora 39 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report. |
python-recordclass fails to build with Python 3.12.0a5. lib/recordclass/_linkedlist.c: In function ‘__Pyx_PyInt_As_long’: lib/recordclass/_linkedlist.c:10807:53: error: ‘PyLongObject’ {aka ‘struct _longobject’} has no member named ‘ob_digit’ 10807 | const digit* digits = ((PyLongObject*)x)->ob_digit; | ^~ lib/recordclass/_linkedlist.c:10862:53: error: ‘PyLongObject’ {aka ‘struct _longobject’} has no member named ‘ob_digit’ 10862 | const digit* digits = ((PyLongObject*)x)->ob_digit; | ^~ lib/recordclass/_linkedlist.c: In function ‘__Pyx_PyInt_As_int’: lib/recordclass/_linkedlist.c:11041:53: error: ‘PyLongObject’ {aka ‘struct _longobject’} has no member named ‘ob_digit’ 11041 | const digit* digits = ((PyLongObject*)x)->ob_digit; | ^~ lib/recordclass/_linkedlist.c:11096:53: error: ‘PyLongObject’ {aka ‘struct _longobject’} has no member named ‘ob_digit’ 11096 | const digit* digits = ((PyLongObject*)x)->ob_digit; | ^~ lib/recordclass/_linkedlist.c: In function ‘__Pyx_PyIndex_AsSsize_t’: lib/recordclass/_linkedlist.c:11547:45: error: ‘PyLongObject’ {aka ‘struct _longobject’} has no member named ‘ob_digit’ 11547 | const digit* digits = ((PyLongObject*)b)->ob_digit; | ^~ error: command '/usr/bin/gcc' failed with exit code 1 error: subprocess-exited-with-error GH-101291: Refactor the PyLongObject struct #101292 https://github.com/python/cpython/pull/101292 https://docs.python.org/3.12/whatsnew/3.12.html For the build logs, see: https://copr-be.cloud.fedoraproject.org/results/@python/python3.12/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/05576973-python-recordclass/ For all our attempts to build python-recordclass with Python 3.12, see: https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/g/python/python3.12/package/python-recordclass/ Testing and mass rebuild of packages is happening in copr. You can follow these instructions to test locally in mock if your package builds with Python 3.12: https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/g/python/python3.12/ Let us know here if you have any questions. Python 3.12 is planned to be included in Fedora 39. To make that update smoother, we're building Fedora packages with all pre-releases of Python 3.12. A build failure prevents us from testing all dependent packages (transitive [Build]Requires), so if this package is required a lot, it's important for us to get it fixed soon. We'd appreciate help from the people who know this package best, but if you don't want to work on this now, let us know so we can try to work around it on our side.