Bug 220317
| Summary: | The version marked as 1.9.18 is not 1.9.18, newer version available | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Tomas Janousek <tjanouse> | ||||
| Component: | hnb | Assignee: | Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski <dominik> | ||||
| Status: | CLOSED RAWHIDE | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> | ||||
| Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |||||
| Priority: | medium | ||||||
| Version: | 6 | ||||||
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||||||
| Target Release: | --- | ||||||
| Hardware: | All | ||||||
| OS: | Linux | ||||||
| Whiteboard: | |||||||
| Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |||||
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |||||
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||||||
| Last Closed: | 2007-09-07 11:13:16 UTC | Type: | --- | ||||
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- | ||||
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |||||
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |||||
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |||||
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |||||
| Embargoed: | |||||||
| Attachments: |
|
||||||
|
Description
Tomas Janousek
2006-12-20 12:44:32 UTC
Created attachment 144093 [details]
proposed srpm
Why do you claim the sources are 1.9.18-pre? Because there was a tarball of 1.9.18-pre6 available to download a year or two ago and the changelog contained more entries than your one does. (and still less entries than the cvs changelog does, which is, if i understand correctly, still not final 1.9.18) I don't know which 1.9.18-pre6 tarball you're talking about, but the one in http://hnb.sourceforge.net/.files/ is definitely older than full 1.9.18 in the same directory. There are no newer tarballs. This is a real fun. The 1.9.18 is lacking half the features of pre6, according to changelog/diff. So I have no clue what is the right version and what to do :). I compared all the tarballs in that directory and it seems that pre7 tarball contains the newest code. Can you confirm that it has the missing features? OK, I've just found a patch in Debian package that seems to add some more features and fixes some compiler warnings: http://ftp.debian.org/debian/pool/main/h/hnb/hnb_1.9.18-3.diff.gz . I can add that one, too. Well, pre7 isn't still as new as the CVS one. And the debian patch appears to address different issues. I forked the project though, planning to do some development of my wishes etc., so I probably don't care much anymore. Thanks for the time you spent investigating, anyway. Having an active upstream is a good thing. I have no problem with switching to your fork. However, I don't want to package a CVS snapshot of unknown origin. If you have a website for your hnb fork somewhere and it has a tarball available, I'll be happy to package that. I guess the original author has lost interest in developing hnb. I haven't received any reply to my e-mails from him. Yeah, I haven't received reply to my mails (it might be more than 2 years now) neither. I don't have a website yet, but I think I might create one after I achieve a few goals and release a tarball. I will let you know. I noticed that you switched to pre7 and applied the debian patch recently, so I'm closing this report as it effectively fixes it. Btw, the debian patch introduced a bug in editing -- the cursor no longer marks the place where the logical cursor is, the highlight is always at the end of the node. I found this when I was reviewing the patch for applying to my fork. This is fixed in my tree. And I finally managed to make some commits and release a version. It's available at http://nomi.cz/download/releases/lhnb/ |