Bug 2209120

Summary:	selinux-policy-doc and container-selinux.8 manpage ownership
Product:	[Fedora] Fedora	Reporter:	Lokesh Mandvekar <lsm5>
Component:	selinux-policy	Assignee:	Zdenek Pytela <zpytela>
Status:	CLOSED CURRENTRELEASE	QA Contact:	Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity:	medium	Docs Contact:
Priority:	low
Version:	rawhide	CC:	dwalsh, lvrabec, mmalik, nknazeko, omosnacek, pkoncity, vmojzis, zpytela
Target Milestone:	---	Keywords:	Triaged
Target Release:	---
Hardware:	Unspecified
OS:	Linux
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:	selinux-policy-38.17-1.fc38.noarch selinux-policy-38.17-1.fc39.noarch	Doc Type:	If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:
Clones:	2218362 (view as bug list)		Environment:
Last Closed:	2023-06-27 17:10:30 UTC	Type:	---
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On:
Bug Blocks:	2218362

Description Lokesh Mandvekar 2023-05-22 17:22:02 UTC

The container_selinux.8 manpage is a part of upstream container-selinux and imho best owned by the container-selinux package.

I think it should be removed from selinux-policy-doc.

Reproducible: Didn't try

Comment 1 Lokesh Mandvekar 2023-05-22 18:01:17 UTC

PTAL https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/selinux-policy/pull-request/340#

Comment 2 Lokesh Mandvekar 2023-06-27 17:32:16 UTC

Thanks Zdenek, did this get fixed in 38.18? Any idea when it will land in fedora 38, 37 and also CentOS Stream 8,9 ?

We're now handling container-selinux via packit and we also manage a `podman-next` copr with centos stream envs, that's why I ask about all distro versions.

Comment 3 Zdenek Pytela 2023-06-27 18:08:16 UTC

(In reply to Lokesh Mandvekar from comment #2)
> Thanks Zdenek, did this get fixed in 38.18? Any idea when it will land in
> fedora 38, 37 and also CentOS Stream 8,9 ?
> 
> We're now handling container-selinux via packit and we also manage a
> `podman-next` copr with centos stream envs, that's why I ask about all
> distro versions.

Actually selinux-policy-38.17-1.fc38.noarch as announced in
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/selinux-policy/pull-request/340#comment-146092

If you need it i F37, I can do that too, but build was not planned soon, so let me know.

Comment 4 Lokesh Mandvekar 2023-06-27 18:30:20 UTC

(In reply to Zdenek Pytela from comment #3)
> (In reply to Lokesh Mandvekar from comment #2)
> > Thanks Zdenek, did this get fixed in 38.18? Any idea when it will land in
> > fedora 38, 37 and also CentOS Stream 8,9 ?
> > 
> > We're now handling container-selinux via packit and we also manage a
> > `podman-next` copr with centos stream envs, that's why I ask about all
> > distro versions.
> 
> Actually selinux-policy-38.17-1.fc38.noarch as announced in
> https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/selinux-policy/pull-request/340#comment-
> 146092
> 
> If you need it i F37, I can do that too, but build was not planned soon, so
> let me know.

Would be great if you could, thanks! Also, how about centos stream ETA?

Comment 5 Zdenek Pytela 2023-06-28 06:45:04 UTC

(In reply to Lokesh Mandvekar from comment #4)
> (In reply to Zdenek Pytela from comment #3)
> > (In reply to Lokesh Mandvekar from comment #2)
> > > Thanks Zdenek, did this get fixed in 38.18? Any idea when it will land in
> > > fedora 38, 37 and also CentOS Stream 8,9 ?
> > > 
> > > We're now handling container-selinux via packit and we also manage a
> > > `podman-next` copr with centos stream envs, that's why I ask about all
> > > distro versions.
> > 
> > Actually selinux-policy-38.17-1.fc38.noarch as announced in
> > https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/selinux-policy/pull-request/340#comment-
> > 146092
> > 
> > If you need it i F37, I can do that too, but build was not planned soon, so
> > let me know.
> 
> Would be great if you could, thanks! Also, how about centos stream ETA?

We need a bz both for RHEL 8 and RHEL 9 if this is required.