+++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #2209120 +++ The container_selinux.8 manpage is a part of upstream container-selinux and imho best owned by the container-selinux package. I think it should be removed from selinux-policy-doc. Reproducible: Didn't try --- Additional comment from Lokesh Mandvekar on 2023-05-22 20:01:17 CEST --- PTAL https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/selinux-policy/pull-request/340# --- Additional comment from Lokesh Mandvekar on 2023-06-27 19:32:16 CEST --- Thanks Zdenek, did this get fixed in 38.18? Any idea when it will land in fedora 38, 37 and also CentOS Stream 8,9 ? We're now handling container-selinux via packit and we also manage a `podman-next` copr with centos stream envs, that's why I ask about all distro versions. --- Additional comment from Zdenek Pytela on 2023-06-27 20:08:16 CEST --- (In reply to Lokesh Mandvekar from comment #2) > Thanks Zdenek, did this get fixed in 38.18? Any idea when it will land in > fedora 38, 37 and also CentOS Stream 8,9 ? > > We're now handling container-selinux via packit and we also manage a > `podman-next` copr with centos stream envs, that's why I ask about all > distro versions. Actually selinux-policy-38.17-1.fc38.noarch as announced in https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/selinux-policy/pull-request/340#comment-146092 If you need it i F37, I can do that too, but build was not planned soon, so let me know. --- Additional comment from Lokesh Mandvekar on 2023-06-27 20:30:20 CEST --- (In reply to Zdenek Pytela from comment #3) > (In reply to Lokesh Mandvekar from comment #2) > > Thanks Zdenek, did this get fixed in 38.18? Any idea when it will land in > > fedora 38, 37 and also CentOS Stream 8,9 ? > > > > We're now handling container-selinux via packit and we also manage a > > `podman-next` copr with centos stream envs, that's why I ask about all > > distro versions. > > Actually selinux-policy-38.17-1.fc38.noarch as announced in > https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/selinux-policy/pull-request/340#comment- > 146092 > > If you need it i F37, I can do that too, but build was not planned soon, so > let me know. Would be great if you could, thanks! Also, how about centos stream ETA? --- Additional comment from Zdenek Pytela on 2023-06-28 08:45:04 CEST --- (In reply to Lokesh Mandvekar from comment #4) > (In reply to Zdenek Pytela from comment #3) > > (In reply to Lokesh Mandvekar from comment #2) > > > Thanks Zdenek, did this get fixed in 38.18? Any idea when it will land in > > > fedora 38, 37 and also CentOS Stream 8,9 ? > > > > > > We're now handling container-selinux via packit and we also manage a > > > `podman-next` copr with centos stream envs, that's why I ask about all > > > distro versions. > > > > Actually selinux-policy-38.17-1.fc38.noarch as announced in > > https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/selinux-policy/pull-request/340#comment- > > 146092 > > > > If you need it i F37, I can do that too, but build was not planned soon, so > > let me know. > > Would be great if you could, thanks! Also, how about centos stream ETA? We need a bz both for RHEL 8 and RHEL 9 if this is required.