Bug 222488
| Summary: | gaim-devel should require pkgconfig | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Jeffrey C. Ollie <jeff> |
| Component: | gaim | Assignee: | Warren Togami <wtogami> |
| Status: | CLOSED RAWHIDE | QA Contact: | |
| Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | medium | ||
| Version: | 6 | CC: | eblanton, lschiere+bugs, mark, redhat-bugzilla, stu, wtogami |
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||
| Target Release: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | All | ||
| OS: | Linux | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2007-04-17 19:50:56 UTC | Type: | --- |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
| Embargoed: | |||
|
Description
Jeffrey C. Ollie
2007-01-12 21:21:09 UTC
Is this really true? There is no reason you can't build against Gaim *without* pkgconfig, really. (Ultimately this is a Fedora policy question, of course, and as such doesn't really affect upstream very much, I guess.) Yes, it's a part of the package review guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ReviewGuidelines?action=diff&rev2=37&rev1=35 This will be in the next build. |