Bug 2224974
Summary: | libtiff: integer overflow in tiffcp.c | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Other] Security Response | Reporter: | Dhananjay Arunesh <darunesh> |
Component: | vulnerability | Assignee: | Nobody <nobody> |
Status: | CLOSED DUPLICATE | QA Contact: | |
Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | medium | ||
Version: | unspecified | CC: | bdettelb, carnil, caswilli, hkataria, jburrell, jkoehler, jsherril, kaycoth, kshier, mmuzila, nforro, rh-spice-bugs |
Target Milestone: | --- | Keywords: | Security |
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | If docs needed, set a value | |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2023-08-28 08:55:23 UTC | Type: | --- |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: | |||
Bug Depends On: | 2226745, 2226746, 2226747, 2226748 | ||
Bug Blocks: | 2222912 |
Description
Dhananjay Arunesh
2023-07-24 07:12:26 UTC
This CVE is referenced at https://gitlab.com/libtiff/libtiff/-/issues/592 (but it looks that this RHBZ entry is swapped with actually CVE-2023-38288). In reply to comment #3: > This CVE is referenced at https://gitlab.com/libtiff/libtiff/-/issues/592 > (but it looks that this RHBZ entry is swapped with actually CVE-2023-38288). Hi, These CVEs are assigned by us (Red Hat CNA), CVEs attached to the bugs are from the final vulnerabilities report sent by the reporter. I am discussing about this issue with the reporter to rectify from his end. Same question as in https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2224971#c5 *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 2235265 *** Rejected the old CVE and re-assigned the vulnerabiliy with new flaw and CVE. Please track the below link[0] for more information. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2235265 Regardng the comment for the old CVE (as Not a security issue) on Mitre, we are working to correct the statement. |