Bug 2224974 - libtiff: integer overflow in tiffcp.c
Summary: libtiff: integer overflow in tiffcp.c
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED DUPLICATE of bug 2235265
Alias: None
Product: Security Response
Classification: Other
Component: vulnerability
Version: unspecified
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
medium
medium
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Nobody
QA Contact:
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On: 2226745 2226746 2226747 2226748
Blocks: 2222912
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2023-07-24 07:12 UTC by Dhananjay Arunesh
Modified: 2023-09-22 21:19 UTC (History)
12 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2023-08-28 08:55:23 UTC
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Dhananjay Arunesh 2023-07-24 07:12:26 UTC
Multiple potential integer overflow in tiffcp.c in libtiff <= 4.5.1 can allow remote attackers to cause a denial of service (application crash) or possibly execute an arbitrary code via a crafted tiff image which triggers a heap-based buffer overflow.

Comment 3 Salvatore Bonaccorso 2023-07-30 22:02:16 UTC
This CVE is referenced at https://gitlab.com/libtiff/libtiff/-/issues/592 (but it looks that this RHBZ entry is swapped with actually CVE-2023-38288).

Comment 4 Dhananjay Arunesh 2023-08-02 09:28:19 UTC
In reply to comment #3:
> This CVE is referenced at https://gitlab.com/libtiff/libtiff/-/issues/592
> (but it looks that this RHBZ entry is swapped with actually CVE-2023-38288).

Hi, These CVEs are assigned by us (Red Hat CNA), CVEs attached to the bugs are from the final vulnerabilities report sent by the reporter. I am discussing about this issue with the reporter to rectify from his end.

Comment 5 Salvatore Bonaccorso 2023-08-13 11:45:38 UTC
Same question as in https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2224971#c5

Comment 6 Dhananjay Arunesh 2023-08-28 08:55:23 UTC

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 2235265 ***

Comment 7 Dhananjay Arunesh 2023-08-28 08:59:57 UTC
Rejected the old CVE and re-assigned the vulnerabiliy with new flaw and CVE. Please track the below link[0] for more information.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2235265

Regardng the comment for the old CVE (as Not a security issue) on Mitre, we are working to correct the statement.


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.