Bug 2226668
Summary: | Review Request: gismo - A C++ library for isogeometric analysis (IGA) | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Felix Wang <topazus> | ||||
Component: | Package Review | Assignee: | Benson Muite <benson_muite> | ||||
Status: | ASSIGNED --- | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> | ||||
Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |||||
Priority: | medium | ||||||
Version: | rawhide | CC: | benson_muite, package-review | ||||
Target Milestone: | --- | Flags: | benson_muite:
fedora-review?
|
||||
Target Release: | --- | ||||||
Hardware: | All | ||||||
OS: | Linux | ||||||
Whiteboard: | |||||||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | If docs needed, set a value | |||||
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |||||
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||||||
Last Closed: | Type: | --- | |||||
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- | ||||
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |||||
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |||||
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |||||
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |||||
Embargoed: | |||||||
Attachments: |
|
Description
Felix Wang
2023-07-26 07:38:55 UTC
[fedora-review-service-build] Copr build: https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/build/6645833 (failed) Build log: https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/@fedora-review/fedora-review-2226668-gismo/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/06645833-gismo/builder-live.log.gz Please make sure the package builds successfully at least for Fedora Rawhide. - If the build failed for unrelated reasons (e.g. temporary network unavailability), please ignore it. - If the build failed because of missing BuildRequires, please make sure they are listed in the "Depends On" field --- This comment was created by the fedora-review-service https://github.com/FrostyX/fedora-review-service If you want to trigger a new Copr build, add a comment containing new Spec and SRPM URLs or [fedora-review-service-build] string. Spec URL: https://topazus.fedorapeople.org/rpms/gismo.spec SRPM URL: https://topazus.fedorapeople.org/rpms/gismo-21.12.0-1.20230630gitf3e05c3.fc39.src.rpm update to 23.09. Spec URL: https://topazus.fedorapeople.org/rpms/gismo.spec SRPM URL: https://topazus.fedorapeople.org/rpms/gismo-23.09.0-1.fc40.src.rpm Copr build: https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/build/6646434 (failed) Build log: https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/@fedora-review/fedora-review-2226668-gismo/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/06646434-gismo/builder-live.log.gz Please make sure the package builds successfully at least for Fedora Rawhide. - If the build failed for unrelated reasons (e.g. temporary network unavailability), please ignore it. - If the build failed because of missing BuildRequires, please make sure they are listed in the "Depends On" field --- This comment was created by the fedora-review-service https://github.com/FrostyX/fedora-review-service If you want to trigger a new Copr build, add a comment containing new Spec and SRPM URLs or [fedora-review-service-build] string. Created attachment 1999708 [details]
The .spec file difference from Copr build 6646434 to 6646435
Copr build: https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/build/6646435 (succeeded) Review template: https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/@fedora-review/fedora-review-2226668-gismo/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/06646435-gismo/fedora-review/review.txt Please take a look if any issues were found. --- This comment was created by the fedora-review-service https://github.com/FrostyX/fedora-review-service If you want to trigger a new Copr build, add a comment containing new Spec and SRPM URLs or [fedora-review-service-build] string. Initial comments: a) Can tests be run? b) Should additional functionality be enabled, for example, Eigen, MPI, UMFPACK, TAUCS, SUPERLU? c) Warning when running fedora-review: [!]: Large data in /usr/share should live in a noarch subpackage if package is arched. Note: Arch-ed rpms have a total of 43612160 bytes in /usr/share gismo- examples-23.09.0-1.fc40.aarch64.rpm:43591680 See: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:ReviewGuidelines#Package_Review_Guidelines Probably want to make a noarch package examples-data which would then be required by the examples package. |