Bug 2226668

Summary: Review Request: gismo - A C++ library for isogeometric analysis (IGA)
Product: [Fedora] Fedora Reporter: Felix Wang <topazus>
Component: Package ReviewAssignee: Benson Muite <benson_muite>
Status: ASSIGNED --- QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity: medium Docs Contact:
Priority: medium    
Version: rawhideCC: benson_muite, package-review
Target Milestone: ---Flags: benson_muite: fedora-review?
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: All   
OS: Linux   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Attachments:
Description Flags
The .spec file difference from Copr build 6646434 to 6646435 none

Description Felix Wang 2023-07-26 07:38:55 UTC
Spec URL: https://topazus.fedorapeople.org/rpms/gismo.spec
SRPM URL: https://topazus.fedorapeople.org/rpms/gismo-21.12.0-1.20230630gitf3e05c3.fc39.src.rpm
Description:
G+Smo (Geometry + Simulation Modules, pronounced "gismo") is an open-source C++
library that brings together mathematical tools for geometric design and
numerical simulation. It implements the relatively new paradigm of isogeometric
analysis, which suggests the use of a unified framework in the design and
analysis pipeline. G+Smo is an object-oriented, cross-platform, template C++
library and follows the generic programming principle, with a focus on both
efficiency and ease of use. The library aims at providing access to high
quality, open-source software to the forming isogeometric numerical simulation
community and beyond.

Fedora Account System Username: topazus

Comment 1 Felix Wang 2023-11-16 00:48:25 UTC
[fedora-review-service-build]

Comment 2 Fedora Review Service 2023-11-16 01:15:18 UTC
Copr build:
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/build/6645833
(failed)

Build log:
https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/@fedora-review/fedora-review-2226668-gismo/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/06645833-gismo/builder-live.log.gz

Please make sure the package builds successfully at least for Fedora Rawhide.

- If the build failed for unrelated reasons (e.g. temporary network
  unavailability), please ignore it.
- If the build failed because of missing BuildRequires, please make sure they
  are listed in the "Depends On" field


---
This comment was created by the fedora-review-service
https://github.com/FrostyX/fedora-review-service

If you want to trigger a new Copr build, add a comment containing new
Spec and SRPM URLs or [fedora-review-service-build] string.

Comment 5 Fedora Review Service 2023-11-16 06:09:59 UTC
Copr build:
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/build/6646434
(failed)

Build log:
https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/@fedora-review/fedora-review-2226668-gismo/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/06646434-gismo/builder-live.log.gz

Please make sure the package builds successfully at least for Fedora Rawhide.

- If the build failed for unrelated reasons (e.g. temporary network
  unavailability), please ignore it.
- If the build failed because of missing BuildRequires, please make sure they
  are listed in the "Depends On" field


---
This comment was created by the fedora-review-service
https://github.com/FrostyX/fedora-review-service

If you want to trigger a new Copr build, add a comment containing new
Spec and SRPM URLs or [fedora-review-service-build] string.

Comment 6 Fedora Review Service 2023-11-16 06:26:25 UTC
Created attachment 1999708 [details]
The .spec file difference from Copr build 6646434 to 6646435

Comment 7 Fedora Review Service 2023-11-16 06:26:28 UTC
Copr build:
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/build/6646435
(succeeded)

Review template:
https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/@fedora-review/fedora-review-2226668-gismo/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/06646435-gismo/fedora-review/review.txt

Please take a look if any issues were found.

---
This comment was created by the fedora-review-service
https://github.com/FrostyX/fedora-review-service

If you want to trigger a new Copr build, add a comment containing new
Spec and SRPM URLs or [fedora-review-service-build] string.

Comment 8 Benson Muite 2023-11-16 08:19:24 UTC
Initial comments:
a) Can tests be run?
b) Should additional functionality be enabled, for example, Eigen, MPI, UMFPACK, TAUCS, SUPERLU?

Comment 9 Benson Muite 2023-11-18 18:59:50 UTC
c) Warning when running fedora-review:

[!]: Large data in /usr/share should live in a noarch subpackage if package
     is arched.
     Note: Arch-ed rpms have a total of 43612160 bytes in /usr/share gismo-
     examples-23.09.0-1.fc40.aarch64.rpm:43591680
     See:
     https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:ReviewGuidelines#Package_Review_Guidelines
Probably want to make a noarch package examples-data which would then be required by
the examples package.

Comment 10 Package Review 2024-11-18 00:45:23 UTC
This is an automatic check from review-stats script.

This review request ticket hasn't been updated for some time, but it seems
that the review is still being working out by you. If this is right, please
respond to this comment clearing the NEEDINFO flag and try to reach out the
submitter to proceed with the review.

If you're not interested in reviewing this ticket anymore, please clear the
fedora-review flag and reset the assignee, so that a new reviewer can take
this ticket.

Without any reply, this request will shortly be resetted.

Comment 11 Benson Muite 2024-11-19 09:18:34 UTC
Happy to finish review.