Bug 2233124

Summary:	libipuz FTBFS with Sphinx 7.1+ in Fedora Rawhide
Product:	[Fedora] Fedora	Reporter:	Karolina Surma <ksurma>
Component:	libipuz	Assignee:	Davide Cavalca <davide>
Status:	CLOSED ERRATA	QA Contact:
Severity:	medium	Docs Contact:
Priority:	unspecified
Version:	rawhide	CC:	davide
Target Milestone:	---
Target Release:	---
Hardware:	Unspecified
OS:	Linux
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:	libipuz-0.4.4-1.fc38 libipuz-0.4.4-1.fc39	Doc Type:	If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:
Last Closed:	2023-09-08 02:46:48 UTC	Type:	---
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On:
Bug Blocks:	2225274

Description Karolina Surma 2023-08-21 14:16:43 UTC

Documentation for libipuz fails to build in RPM:

+ sphinx-build-3 docs html
Running Sphinx v7.1.2
making output directory... done
WARNING: html_static_path entry '_static' does not exist

Extension error (sphinx.config):
Handler <function correct_copyright_year at 0x7fe717817e20> for event 'config-inited' threw an exception (exception: string index out of range)

The issue is that the upstream conf.py doesn't contain `copyright` in the correct format as documented in Sphinx:
It should be: '2008, Author Name' (source: https://www.sphinx-doc.org/en/master/usage/configuration.html#confval-copyright).
It is: 2023 (source: https://gitlab.gnome.org/jrb/libipuz/-/blob/master/docs/conf.py#L23)

The issue is only visible in the RPM build, not upstream. This inconsistency has been reported to Sphinx project: https://github.com/sphinx-doc/sphinx/issues/11627


Reproducible: Always

Steps to Reproduce:
Test locally in mock: 
$ mock -r fedora-rawhide-x86_64 --addrepo=https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/ksurma/sphinx-7.1.2/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/ --no-clean your.src.rpm
$ mock -r fedora-rawhide-x86_64 --addrepo=https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/ksurma/sphinx-7.1.2/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/ shell

Comment 1 Davide Cavalca 2023-09-04 22:40:54 UTC

Confirmed that this repros in the latest libipuz version as well

Comment 2 Fedora Update System 2023-09-05 05:05:23 UTC

FEDORA-2023-3107d5d9a2 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 39. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2023-3107d5d9a2

Comment 3 Fedora Update System 2023-09-05 05:05:41 UTC

FEDORA-2023-a4ad02d10a has been submitted as an update to Fedora 38. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2023-a4ad02d10a

Comment 4 Fedora Update System 2023-09-06 01:23:41 UTC

FEDORA-2023-a4ad02d10a has been pushed to the Fedora 38 testing repository.
Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing --refresh --advisory=FEDORA-2023-a4ad02d10a`
You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2023-a4ad02d10a

See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates.

Comment 5 Fedora Update System 2023-09-06 01:32:21 UTC

FEDORA-2023-3107d5d9a2 has been pushed to the Fedora 39 testing repository.
Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing --refresh --advisory=FEDORA-2023-3107d5d9a2`
You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2023-3107d5d9a2

See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates.

Comment 6 Fedora Update System 2023-09-08 02:46:48 UTC

FEDORA-2023-a4ad02d10a has been pushed to the Fedora 38 stable repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.

Comment 7 Fedora Update System 2023-09-15 18:48:50 UTC

FEDORA-2023-3107d5d9a2 has been pushed to the Fedora 39 stable repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.