Bug 2237528
| Summary: | clamav packages for version 1.0 LTS not available for RHEL 8 or 7. Will they be updated? | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Fedora] Fedora EPEL | Reporter: | Rick <linuxlover11> |
| Component: | clamav | Assignee: | Robert Scheck <redhat-bugzilla> |
| Status: | CLOSED ERRATA | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
| Severity: | high | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | unspecified | ||
| Version: | epel8 | CC: | anon.amish, bennie.joubert, carl, gerhard.a.neubauer, gk, j, lee.jnk, ondrejj, orion, redhat-bugzilla, rh-bugzilla, sergio, steve, yferszt |
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||
| Target Release: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | x86_64 | ||
| OS: | Linux | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | If docs needed, set a value | |
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2024-09-21 19:25:01 UTC | Type: | Bug |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
| Embargoed: | |||
|
Description
Rick
2023-09-05 20:51:56 UTC
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/?search=clamav as you can see in link above clamav-0.103.10-1.el7 and clamav-0.103.10-1.el8 are on testing repo . in 3 day will be on stable if no one complains I need version 1.0, not 0.103 Currently RHEL 9 has version clamav-1.0.2-1.el9, but it is not available for RHEL 8 or 7 ah sorry, I can't say must more that you already know epel9 got it test on epel8 failed last notice that I can remember are from 18 Feb 2023 From: Orion Poplawski To: clamav-maintainers Subject: Re: Future support of clamav in EPEL7 and EPEL8 Date: Sat, 18 Feb 2023 15:44:09 -0700 (18/02/2023 22:44:09) clamav-maintainers - I'm exploring the COPR route here - https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/orion/clamav-el8/builds/ I'm getting some test failures which I have reported upstream here: https://github.com/Cisco-Talos/clamav/issues/842 If I can get that resolved, I think it would be good to provide clamav 1.X for EL7/8 in COPR. My suggestion would be to create a 'clamav' FAS group so we can have a 'clamav' group in COPR that can maintain it. Thoughts? Orion also we request extend 0.103 support https://www.mail-archive.com/clamav-users@lists.clamav.net/msg52509.html (In reply to Rick from comment #2) > I need version 1.0, not 0.103 Why? If you do, why not use EL9? I'm not currently planning on updating EL7, as it goes EOL (June 30, 2024) before 0.103 goes EOL (Sep-14 2024) and I wasn't planning on updating EL8 until 0.103 is EOL. (In reply to Orion Poplawski from comment #5) > (In reply to Rick from comment #2) > > I need version 1.0, not 0.103 > > Why? If you do, why not use EL9? > > I'm not currently planning on updating EL7, as it goes EOL (June 30, 2024) > before 0.103 goes EOL (Sep-14 2024) and I wasn't planning on updating EL8 > until 0.103 is EOL. These systems are critical to some of my companies programs and are not easy to upgrade with so much relying on them. I agree most EL7 systems will need to be upgraded when they go EOL but RHEL 8 is compliant till 2029 and updates should still be maintained and produced for people still using them. I will not have the ability to upgrade hundreds of systems to RHEL 9 just because 1.0 clamav packages aren't available... (In reply to Sergio Basto from comment #4) > ah sorry, > > I can't say must more that you already know epel9 got it > > test on epel8 failed > > last notice that I can remember are from 18 Feb 2023 > > > From: Orion Poplawski > To: clamav-maintainers > Subject: Re: Future support of clamav in EPEL7 and EPEL8 > Date: Sat, 18 Feb 2023 15:44:09 -0700 (18/02/2023 22:44:09) > > > clamav-maintainers - > > I'm exploring the COPR route here - > https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/orion/clamav-el8/builds/ > > I'm getting some test failures which I have reported upstream here: > https://github.com/Cisco-Talos/clamav/issues/842 > > If I can get that resolved, I think it would be good to provide clamav > 1.X for EL7/8 in COPR. My suggestion would be to create a 'clamav' FAS > group so we can have a 'clamav' group in COPR that can maintain it. > > Thoughts? > > Orion > > also we request extend 0.103 support > > https://www.mail-archive.com/clamav-users@lists.clamav.net/msg52509.html Thank you for this information. Its encouraging to see some people are working on it but it scares me its been quiet for awhile now. is there anyway to bump that email/comment from Orion or ask if there has been any update? bump Hi, what is the status of clamav at EL8? Any hint what is planned for EL8, seems that nobody take care about EL8 and having a up-to-date-clamav also at EL8. Seems that nobody is working on the issue failed the EL8 test, right? kr Gerhard for the latest news see https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/clamav/pull-request/26 anyone knows how to announce the upgrade to 3rd-paties like Plesk and CPanel ? FEDORA-EPEL-2024-0bde0374ec (clamav-1.0.6-1.el8) has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL 8. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2024-0bde0374ec FEDORA-EPEL-2024-0bde0374ec has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 8 testing repository. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2024-0bde0374ec See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates. in less of one week this update will got to stable and I got none, nienty, zero feedback, neither good or bad > anyone knows how to announce the upgrade to 3rd-paties like Plesk and CPanel ? I don't know anyone that has direct contact, but the general EPEL policy for incompatible updates involves several steps to spread awareness that can help with this. https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/epel/epel-policy-incompatible-upgrades/ This policy doesn't seem to have been followed here, which is a big problem. This update changes from libclamav.so.9 to libclamav.so.11. It will require rebuilding c-icap-modules and librpminspect. If you release it in the current state you'll break installation of those packages. They should have been rebuilt in a side tag with clamav and released together. This is by definition an incompatible update. Do not push this update to stable until you have followed the policy. OK , thank you for your attention we decided this here https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/clamav/pull-request/26#comment-196845 Yes, I read that pull request. But this is not something packagers can decide on their own. It must be proposed and then the EPEL Steering Committee decides if the proposal can move forward. Please familiarize yourself with the general EPEL guidelines [0], the EPEL Updates Policy [1], and the EPEL Incompatible Upgrades Policy [2]. [0] https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/epel/epel-policy/ [1] https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/epel/epel-policy-updates/ [2] https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/epel/epel-policy-incompatible-upgrades/ Clamav upgrade will be pushed to updates next Monday, September 2, 2024 |