Bug 2241998

Summary: Review Request: golang-fortio-version - Reusable wrappers/utils to extract version(s)
Product: [Fedora] Fedora Reporter: Pavel Solovev <daron439>
Component: Package ReviewAssignee: Nobody's working on this, feel free to take it <nobody>
Status: NEW --- QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity: unspecified Docs Contact:
Priority: unspecified    
Version: rawhideCC: mikel, package-review
Target Milestone: ---Keywords: AutomationTriaged
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: Unspecified   
OS: Unspecified   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On:    
Bug Blocks: 1998778, 2241997, 2242000    

Description Pavel Solovev 2023-10-03 19:02:17 UTC
Spec URL: https://solopasha.fedorapeople.org/for-review/golang-fortio-version.spec
SRPM URL: https://solopasha.fedorapeople.org/for-review/golang-fortio-version-1.0.3-1.fc40.src.rpm

Description:
Reusable wrappers/utils to extract version(s) from golang Buildinfo included in
`go install`ed binaries.

Fedora Account System Username: solopasha

Comment 1 Pavel Solovev 2023-10-03 19:02:21 UTC
This package built on koji:  https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=107026617

Comment 2 Mikel Olasagasti Uranga 2024-03-06 20:00:11 UTC
As mentioned in https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2241989 spec is correct, but update to go2rpm-1.11.0 template before importing.

I am not going to go through the whole fedora-review template, as this package uses go2rpm.

- [x] The specfile is sane.
- [x] License is correct
- [x] Builds successfully in mock
- [x] Package is installable (checked by fedora-review)
- [x] No relevant rpmlint errors
- [x] %check section passes
- [x] The latest version is packaged
- [x] `%goipath` is set correctly
- [-] Binaries don't conflict with binaries already in the distribution
- [x] The package complies with the Packaging Guidelines.

Package approved! On import, don't forget to do the following:

- [ ] Add package to release-monitoring.org
- [ ] Give go-sig privileges on package
- [ ] Close the review bug by referencing it in the rpm changelog and the Bodhi ticket.

Comment 3 Package Review 2025-05-03 09:47:54 UTC
Package was never imported.
The ticket status is being reset, since creating the repository will require a fresh approval.
Let us know if you're still interested in this package.

Comment 4 Fedora Review Service 2025-11-20 14:37:57 UTC
Hello,
I do realize that this is possibly an old ticket. I am sorry that it hasn't been
reviewed yet. Let me trigger the Fedora Review Service to see if the package
builds successfully. Hopefully, a green check mark will attract some reviewer.

If I am resurrecting an old ticket that you are not interested in anymore, my
apologies, feel free to close it.

[fedora-review-service-build]

Comment 5 Fedora Review Service 2025-11-20 14:42:26 UTC
Copr build:
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/build/9819665
(succeeded)

Review template:
https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/@fedora-review/fedora-review-2241998-golang-fortio-version/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/09819665-golang-fortio-version/fedora-review/review.txt

Please take a look if any issues were found.


---
This comment was created by the fedora-review-service
https://github.com/FrostyX/fedora-review-service

If you want to trigger a new Copr build, add a comment containing new
Spec and SRPM URLs or [fedora-review-service-build] string.