Bug 2246237

Summary: Please branch and build python-dateparser in epel9
Product: [Fedora] Fedora EPEL Reporter: Michel Lind <michel>
Component: python-dateparserAssignee: Michel Lind <michel>
Status: CLOSED ERRATA QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity: unspecified Docs Contact:
Priority: unspecified    
Version: epel9CC: gwync, mail, mhayden
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: Unspecified   
OS: Unspecified   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: python-dateparser-1.1.7-3.el9 Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2023-12-22 02:09:32 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On: 2208063    
Bug Blocks: 1914423, 2208051, 2246238    

Description Michel Lind 2023-10-25 22:37:07 UTC 
Please branch and build python-dateparser in epel9.

If you do not wish to maintain python-dateparser in epel9,
or do not think you will be able to do this in a timely manner,
the EPEL Packagers SIG would be happy to be a co-maintainer of the package;
please add the epel-packagers-sig group through
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python-dateparser/addgroup
and grant it commit access, or collaborator access on epel* branches.

I would also be happy to be a co-maintainer (FAS: salimma);
please add me through https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python-dateparser/adduser
Comment 1 Michel Lind 2023-10-25 22:40:01 UTC 
The Rawhide branch already builds fine as is once the missing dependencies are in, after @mhayden conditionally disabled docs generation: https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python-dateparser/c/aad5d08ebce2bf82622cc7f425c8789ced2b7bba?branch=rawhide

so we just need the branch to be created, and preferably getting added to the ACL, thanks
Comment 2 Michel Lind 2023-11-03 02:20:15 UTC 
Will you be able to branch and build python-dateparser in epel9?

The EPEL Packagers SIG would be happy to be a co-maintainer of the package
if you do not to build it on epel9.

I would also be happy to be a co-maintainer (FAS: salimma).
Comment 3 Fedora Admin user for bugzilla script actions 2023-12-21 12:13:34 UTC 
This package has changed maintainer in Fedora. Reassigning to the new maintainer of this component.
Comment 4 Michel Lind 2023-12-21 16:55:01 UTC 
*** Bug 2208065 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 5 Fedora Update System 2023-12-21 20:09:00 UTC 
FEDORA-EPEL-2023-4c6b819c9c has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL 9. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2023-4c6b819c9c
Comment 6 Fedora Update System 2023-12-22 02:09:32 UTC 
FEDORA-EPEL-2023-4c6b819c9c has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 9 stable repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.