Bug 2249395
Summary: | Review Request: 86box - Emulator of x86-based machines based on PCem. | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Leo Puvilland <leo> |
Component: | Package Review | Assignee: | Artur Frenszek-Iwicki <fedora> |
Status: | ASSIGNED --- | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | unspecified | ||
Version: | rawhide | CC: | fedora, leo, package-review |
Target Milestone: | --- | Keywords: | AutomationTriaged |
Target Release: | --- | Flags: | ppisar:
fedora-review?
|
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
URL: | https://86box.net | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | If docs needed, set a value | |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | Type: | --- | |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: |
Description
Leo Puvilland
2023-11-12 19:40:21 UTC
> Spec URL: https://pagure.io/86box/blob/master/f/86box.spec This leads to a syntax-highlighted HTML rendition of the spec. Please use "raw file" links. > License: GPLv2+ Old Callaway-style tag. The SPDX equivalent of this is "GPL-2.0-or-later". https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/LicensingGuidelines/#_valid_license_short_names > %ifarch i386 x86_64 It'd probably be safer to use the "%{ix86}" macro here instead of just "i386". > %ifarch arm aarch64 Same here - use the "%{arm32}" macro to check for 32-bit ARM architectures. > mkdir -p $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_datadir}/icons/hicolor/${i}x${i}/apps > ... > desktop-file-install --dir=%{buildroot}%{_datadir}/applications src/unix/assets/net.86box.86Box.desktop Mixed use of %{buildroot} and $RPM_BUILD_ROOT. Please pick one and stick with it. https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/#_using_buildroot_and_optflags_vs_rpm_build_root_and_rpm_opt_flags Fixed these issues. Spec URL: https://pagure.io/86box/raw/master/f/86box.spec SRPM URL: https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/leo/86box/srpm-builds/06637672/86Box-4.0.1-1.src.rpm Description: Emulator of x86-based machines based on PCem. Fedora Account System Username: leo Koji Build: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=109051593 Whoops, wrong spec URL. Spec URL: https://pagure.io/86box/raw/master/f/86Box.spec SRPM URL: https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/leo/86box/srpm-builds/06637672/86Box-4.0.1-1.src.rpm Description: Emulator of x86-based machines based on PCem. Fedora Account System Username: leo Koji Build: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=109051593 Hi Leo, could you update this to v4.1? https://github.com/86Box/86Box/releases/tag/v4.1 Leo, are you still interested in packaging this? Apologies. Will update ASAP. Updated to 4.1. Spec URL: Spec URL: https://pagure.io/86box/raw/master/f/86Box.spec SRPM URL: https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/leo/86box/srpm-builds/07920923/86Box-4.1-1.src.rpm Koji Build: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=122177932 > Version: 4.1 v4.2 is now available. https://github.com/86Box/86Box/releases/tag/v4.2 > cp src/unix/assets/${i}x${i}/net.86box.86Box.png %{buildroot}%{_datadir}/icons/hicolor/${i}x${i}/apps > [...] > cp src/unix/assets/net.86box.86Box.metainfo.xml %{buildroot}%{_metainfodir} Please use `cp -p` or `install -p` to preserve timestamps. https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/#_timestamps Fixed these issues, thank you! Updated to v4.2 Spec URL: https://pagure.io/86box/raw/master/f/86Box.spec SRPM: https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/leo/86box/srpm-builds/08028425/86Box-4.2-1.src.rpm Koji Build: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=123555066 Copr build: https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/build/8028511 (succeeded) Review template: https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/@fedora-review/fedora-review-2249395-86box/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/08028511-86Box/fedora-review/review.txt Please take a look if any issues were found. --- This comment was created by the fedora-review-service https://github.com/FrostyX/fedora-review-service If you want to trigger a new Copr build, add a comment containing new Spec and SRPM URLs or [fedora-review-service-build] string. |