Bug 2253052

Summary:	Review Request: microscheme - A functional programming language for the Arduino
Product:	[Fedora] Fedora	Reporter:	Benson Muite <benson_muite>
Component:	Package Review	Assignee:	Phil Wyett <philip.wyett>
Status:	ASSIGNED ---	QA Contact:	Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity:	medium	Docs Contact:
Priority:	unspecified
Version:	rawhide	CC:	neil, package-review, philip.wyett
Target Milestone:	---	Flags:	philip.wyett: fedora-review?
Target Release:	---
Hardware:	Unspecified
OS:	Linux
URL:	https://ryansuchocki.github.io/microscheme/
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:		Doc Type:	If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:
Last Closed:		Type:	---
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description Benson Muite 2023-12-05 19:25:16 UTC

spec: https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/fed500/microscheme/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/06726819-microscheme/microscheme.spec
srpm: https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/fed500/microscheme/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/06726819-microscheme/microscheme-0.9.4-1.fc40.src.rpm

description:
Microscheme, or (ms) for short, is a functional programming language for the
Arduino, and for Atmel 8-bit AVR microcontrollers in general. Microscheme is
a subset of Scheme, in the sense that every valid (ms) program is also a valid
Scheme program (with the exception of Arduino hardware-specific primitives).
The (ms) compiler performs function inlining, and features an aggressive
tree-shaker, eliminating unused top-level definitions. Microscheme has a robust
FFI (Foreign Function Interface) meaning that C code may be invoked directly
from (ms) programs. Therefore, the power of the existing wealth of Arduino
libraries is available within Microscheme.

fas: fed500

Koji build:
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=109951556

Reproducible: Always

Comment 1 Fedora Review Service 2023-12-05 19:35:14 UTC

Copr build:
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/build/6727177
(succeeded)

Review template:
https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/@fedora-review/fedora-review-2253052-microscheme/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/06727177-microscheme/fedora-review/review.txt

Please take a look if any issues were found.


---
This comment was created by the fedora-review-service
https://github.com/FrostyX/fedora-review-service

If you want to trigger a new Copr build, add a comment containing new
Spec and SRPM URLs or [fedora-review-service-build] string.

Comment 2 Neil Hanlon 2024-04-26 02:40:59 UTC

Review comments:

1. rpmlint reports binary is not compiled as position-independent -- is this a result of the flag change in %prep?

microscheme.x86_64: W: position-independent-executable-suggested /usr/bin/microscheme

2. Is there any documentation that can be provided, or should?

3. It appears upstream has not been updated in quite some time -- is there a more active fork or source for this?

Comment 3 Package Review 2025-09-29 00:45:32 UTC

This is an automatic check from review-stats script.

This review request ticket hasn't been updated for some time, but it seems
that the review is still being working out by you. If this is right, please
respond to this comment clearing the NEEDINFO flag and try to reach out the
submitter to proceed with the review.

If you're not interested in reviewing this ticket anymore, please clear the
fedora-review flag and reset the assignee, so that a new reviewer can take
this ticket.

Without any reply, this request will shortly be resetted.

Comment 4 Package Review 2025-10-30 00:45:18 UTC

This is an automatic action taken by review-stats script.

The ticket reviewer failed to clear the NEEDINFO flag in a month.
As per https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Policy_for_stalled_package_reviews
we reset the status and the assignee of this ticket.

Comment 5 Phil Wyett 2026-03-22 12:14:03 UTC

Hi,

0.94 was tagged on GitHub in 2022, but is not in releases, any reason?

Is there still a appetite to get this package into Fedora? A quick reply and fresh spec/srpm would tell me I am not wasting time and we can move forward.

Regards

Phil