spec: https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/fed500/microscheme/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/06726819-microscheme/microscheme.spec srpm: https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/fed500/microscheme/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/06726819-microscheme/microscheme-0.9.4-1.fc40.src.rpm description: Microscheme, or (ms) for short, is a functional programming language for the Arduino, and for Atmel 8-bit AVR microcontrollers in general. Microscheme is a subset of Scheme, in the sense that every valid (ms) program is also a valid Scheme program (with the exception of Arduino hardware-specific primitives). The (ms) compiler performs function inlining, and features an aggressive tree-shaker, eliminating unused top-level definitions. Microscheme has a robust FFI (Foreign Function Interface) meaning that C code may be invoked directly from (ms) programs. Therefore, the power of the existing wealth of Arduino libraries is available within Microscheme. fas: fed500 Koji build: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=109951556 Reproducible: Always
Copr build: https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/build/6727177 (succeeded) Review template: https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/@fedora-review/fedora-review-2253052-microscheme/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/06727177-microscheme/fedora-review/review.txt Please take a look if any issues were found. --- This comment was created by the fedora-review-service https://github.com/FrostyX/fedora-review-service If you want to trigger a new Copr build, add a comment containing new Spec and SRPM URLs or [fedora-review-service-build] string.
Review comments: 1. rpmlint reports binary is not compiled as position-independent -- is this a result of the flag change in %prep? microscheme.x86_64: W: position-independent-executable-suggested /usr/bin/microscheme 2. Is there any documentation that can be provided, or should? 3. It appears upstream has not been updated in quite some time -- is there a more active fork or source for this?
This is an automatic check from review-stats script. This review request ticket hasn't been updated for some time, but it seems that the review is still being working out by you. If this is right, please respond to this comment clearing the NEEDINFO flag and try to reach out the submitter to proceed with the review. If you're not interested in reviewing this ticket anymore, please clear the fedora-review flag and reset the assignee, so that a new reviewer can take this ticket. Without any reply, this request will shortly be resetted.
This is an automatic action taken by review-stats script. The ticket reviewer failed to clear the NEEDINFO flag in a month. As per https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Policy_for_stalled_package_reviews we reset the status and the assignee of this ticket.