Bug 2255144

Summary:	algol68g: Missing source files for aclocal.m4
Product:	[Fedora] Fedora	Reporter:	Florian Weimer <fweimer>
Component:	algol68g	Assignee:	Oleg Girko <ol+redhat>
Status:	CLOSED RAWHIDE	QA Contact:
Severity:	medium	Docs Contact:
Priority:	unspecified
Version:	40	CC:	ol+redhat
Target Milestone:	---
Target Release:	---
Hardware:	Unspecified
OS:	Linux
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:	algol68g-3.5.1-2.fc41	Doc Type:	If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:
Last Closed:	2024-05-02 14:53:50 UTC	Type:	---
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On:
Bug Blocks:	2255145

Description Florian Weimer 2023-12-18 21:04:52 UTC

The source tarball does not contain the m4 files that were used to compile the aclocal.m4 script.

Reproducible: Always

Comment 1 Aoife Moloney 2024-02-15 23:08:00 UTC

This bug appears to have been reported against 'rawhide' during the Fedora Linux 40 development cycle.
Changing version to 40.

Comment 2 Oleg Girko 2024-05-01 14:45:43 UTC

Sorry for late reply, I somehow missed this and noticed just yesterday.

I don't understand why this is a problem. If I add autoconf, automake and autoconf-archive packages as buildrequires, I can run autoreconf and re-create configure script successfully. I presume, aclocal.m4 is just generated from normal aclocal coming with Fedora.

Comment 3 Florian Weimer 2024-05-01 21:46:54 UTC

(In reply to Oleg Girko from comment #2)
> Sorry for late reply, I somehow missed this and noticed just yesterday.
> 
> I don't understand why this is a problem. If I add autoconf, automake and
> autoconf-archive packages as buildrequires, I can run autoreconf and
> re-create configure script successfully. I presume, aclocal.m4 is just
> generated from normal aclocal coming with Fedora.

Does this really work, though? I don't think aclocal automatically integrates autoconf-archive.

Comment 4 Oleg Girko 2024-05-01 21:49:37 UTC

Yes, it works.
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=117116710 for example.

Comment 5 Florian Weimer 2024-05-02 07:57:07 UTC

(In reply to Oleg Girko from comment #4)
> Yes, it works.
> https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=117116710 for example.

Agreed, I was mistaken. This looks fine. Parts come from gsl-devel, but that's okay.

Comment 6 Oleg Girko 2024-05-02 13:38:00 UTC

(In reply to Florian Weimer from comment #5)
> Agreed, I was mistaken. This looks fine. Parts come from gsl-devel, but
> that's okay.

So, can I close this ticket?