Bug 2255144 - algol68g: Missing source files for aclocal.m4
Summary: algol68g: Missing source files for aclocal.m4
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED RAWHIDE
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: algol68g
Version: 40
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Linux
unspecified
medium
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Oleg Girko
QA Contact:
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks: 2255145
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2023-12-18 21:04 UTC by Florian Weimer
Modified: 2024-05-02 14:53 UTC (History)
1 user (show)

Fixed In Version: algol68g-3.5.1-2.fc41
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2024-05-02 14:53:50 UTC
Type: ---
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Florian Weimer 2023-12-18 21:04:52 UTC
The source tarball does not contain the m4 files that were used to compile the aclocal.m4 script.

Reproducible: Always

Comment 1 Aoife Moloney 2024-02-15 23:08:00 UTC
This bug appears to have been reported against 'rawhide' during the Fedora Linux 40 development cycle.
Changing version to 40.

Comment 2 Oleg Girko 2024-05-01 14:45:43 UTC
Sorry for late reply, I somehow missed this and noticed just yesterday.

I don't understand why this is a problem. If I add autoconf, automake and autoconf-archive packages as buildrequires, I can run autoreconf and re-create configure script successfully. I presume, aclocal.m4 is just generated from normal aclocal coming with Fedora.

Comment 3 Florian Weimer 2024-05-01 21:46:54 UTC
(In reply to Oleg Girko from comment #2)
> Sorry for late reply, I somehow missed this and noticed just yesterday.
> 
> I don't understand why this is a problem. If I add autoconf, automake and
> autoconf-archive packages as buildrequires, I can run autoreconf and
> re-create configure script successfully. I presume, aclocal.m4 is just
> generated from normal aclocal coming with Fedora.

Does this really work, though? I don't think aclocal automatically integrates autoconf-archive.

Comment 4 Oleg Girko 2024-05-01 21:49:37 UTC
Yes, it works.
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=117116710 for example.

Comment 5 Florian Weimer 2024-05-02 07:57:07 UTC
(In reply to Oleg Girko from comment #4)
> Yes, it works.
> https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=117116710 for example.

Agreed, I was mistaken. This looks fine. Parts come from gsl-devel, but that's okay.

Comment 6 Oleg Girko 2024-05-02 13:38:00 UTC
(In reply to Florian Weimer from comment #5)
> Agreed, I was mistaken. This looks fine. Parts come from gsl-devel, but
> that's okay.

So, can I close this ticket?


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.