Bug 225624

Summary: Merge Review: booty
Product: [Fedora] Fedora Reporter: Nobody's working on this, feel free to take it <nobody>
Component: Package ReviewAssignee: Nobody's working on this, feel free to take it <nobody>
Status: CLOSED NOTABUG QA Contact: Fedora Package Reviews List <fedora-package-review>
Severity: medium Docs Contact:
Priority: medium    
Version: rawhideCC: pjones, redhat-bugzilla, susi.lehtola
Target Milestone: ---Flags: roozbeh: fedora-review-
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: All   
OS: Linux   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2009-04-29 21:13:25 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:

Description Nobody's working on this, feel free to take it 2007-01-31 17:46:51 UTC
Fedora Merge Review: booty

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/booty/
Initial Owner: pjones@redhat.com

Comment 1 Roozbeh Pournader 2007-02-05 15:49:02 UTC
rpmlint output:
  RPM:
W: booty summary-not-capitalized simple python bootloader config lib
W: booty no-url-tag
E: booty only-non-binary-in-usr-lib
E: booty non-executable-script /usr/lib/booty/checkbootloader.py 0644
E: booty non-executable-script /usr/lib/booty/lilo.py 0644
E: booty non-executable-script /usr/lib/booty/grubupdatetest.py 0644
  SRPM:
W: booty summary-not-capitalized simple python bootloader config lib
W: booty no-url-tag
E: booty hardcoded-library-path in /usr/lib/booty

Other problems:

* License filed says LGPL, while the file lilo.py in the package is actually
labeled GPL in the header. (blocker)
* No copy of either GPL or LGPL is provided in tarball or is packaged.
* Use make %{?_smp_mflags} instead of make
* /usr/lib is hard-coded. Use a pref-defined rpm macro instead. (blocker)
* Change %defattr(-,root,root) to %defattr(-,root,root,-)
* Change buildroot to %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n)
* Validity of tarball couldn't be checked, as no upstream is mentioned either as
URL or Source URL. (blocker)
* We no longer have up2date, so its mention should be removed from description.


Comment 2 Robert Scheck 2009-01-13 22:18:10 UTC
Peter, can you please show up on this bug report? It's your package.
Removing you from assigned, as you're just the package owner, not the
package reviewer.

Comment 3 Susi Lehtola 2009-04-29 21:13:25 UTC
The package has been proclaimed dead, closing as NOTABUG.