Bug 225624 - Merge Review: booty
Merge Review: booty
Status: CLOSED NOTABUG
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: Package Review (Show other bugs)
rawhide
All Linux
medium Severity medium
: ---
: ---
Assigned To: Nobody's working on this, feel free to take it
Fedora Package Reviews List
:
Depends On:
Blocks:
  Show dependency treegraph
 
Reported: 2007-01-31 12:46 EST by Nobody's working on this, feel free to take it
Modified: 2009-04-29 17:13 EDT (History)
3 users (show)

See Also:
Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2009-04-29 17:13:25 EDT
Type: ---
Regression: ---
Mount Type: ---
Documentation: ---
CRM:
Verified Versions:
Category: ---
oVirt Team: ---
RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: ---
roozbeh: fedora‑review-


Attachments (Terms of Use)

  None (edit)
Description Nobody's working on this, feel free to take it 2007-01-31 12:46:51 EST
Fedora Merge Review: booty

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/booty/
Initial Owner: pjones@redhat.com
Comment 1 Roozbeh Pournader 2007-02-05 10:49:02 EST
rpmlint output:
  RPM:
W: booty summary-not-capitalized simple python bootloader config lib
W: booty no-url-tag
E: booty only-non-binary-in-usr-lib
E: booty non-executable-script /usr/lib/booty/checkbootloader.py 0644
E: booty non-executable-script /usr/lib/booty/lilo.py 0644
E: booty non-executable-script /usr/lib/booty/grubupdatetest.py 0644
  SRPM:
W: booty summary-not-capitalized simple python bootloader config lib
W: booty no-url-tag
E: booty hardcoded-library-path in /usr/lib/booty

Other problems:

* License filed says LGPL, while the file lilo.py in the package is actually
labeled GPL in the header. (blocker)
* No copy of either GPL or LGPL is provided in tarball or is packaged.
* Use make %{?_smp_mflags} instead of make
* /usr/lib is hard-coded. Use a pref-defined rpm macro instead. (blocker)
* Change %defattr(-,root,root) to %defattr(-,root,root,-)
* Change buildroot to %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n)
* Validity of tarball couldn't be checked, as no upstream is mentioned either as
URL or Source URL. (blocker)
* We no longer have up2date, so its mention should be removed from description.
Comment 2 Robert Scheck 2009-01-13 17:18:10 EST
Peter, can you please show up on this bug report? It's your package.
Removing you from assigned, as you're just the package owner, not the
package reviewer.
Comment 3 Susi Lehtola 2009-04-29 17:13:25 EDT
The package has been proclaimed dead, closing as NOTABUG.

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.