Bug 2256303
| Summary: | Review Request: golang-github-apex-log - Structured logging package for Go | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | W. Michael Petullo <mike> |
| Component: | Package Review | Assignee: | Nobody's working on this, feel free to take it <nobody> |
| Status: | NEW --- | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
| Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | medium | ||
| Version: | rawhide | CC: | arthur, package-review |
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||
| Target Release: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | All | ||
| OS: | Linux | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | If docs needed, set a value | |
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | Type: | --- | |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
| Embargoed: | |||
| Bug Depends On: | 2256305, 2256304, 2256307, 2256313, 2256316 | ||
| Bug Blocks: | 2256315 | ||
|
Description
W. Michael Petullo
2023-12-31 01:29:01 UTC
Spec URL: https://www.flyn.org/SRPMS/golang-github-apex-log.spec SRPM URL: https://www.flyn.org/SRPMS/golang-github-apex-log-1.9.0-1.fc39~bootstrap.src.rpm Use bootstrap to address circular dependencies. Spec URL: https://www.flyn.org/SRPMS/golang-github-apex-log.spec SRPM URL: https://www.flyn.org/SRPMS/golang-github-apex-log-1.9.0-1.fc39~bootstrap.src.rpm Rebuild with go2rpm 1.10.0. Copr build: https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/build/6840027 (failed) Build log: https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/@fedora-review/fedora-review-2256303-golang-github-apex-log/srpm-builds/06840027/builder-live.log.gz Please make sure the package builds successfully at least for Fedora Rawhide. - If the build failed for unrelated reasons (e.g. temporary network unavailability), please ignore it. - If the build failed because of missing BuildRequires, please make sure they are listed in the "Depends On" field --- This comment was created by the fedora-review-service https://github.com/FrostyX/fedora-review-service If you want to trigger a new Copr build, add a comment containing new Spec and SRPM URLs or [fedora-review-service-build] string. Copr build: https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/build/6840040 (failed) Build log: https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/@fedora-review/fedora-review-2256303-golang-github-apex-log/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/06840040-golang-github-apex-log/builder-live.log.gz Please make sure the package builds successfully at least for Fedora Rawhide. - If the build failed for unrelated reasons (e.g. temporary network unavailability), please ignore it. - If the build failed because of missing BuildRequires, please make sure they are listed in the "Depends On" field --- This comment was created by the fedora-review-service https://github.com/FrostyX/fedora-review-service If you want to trigger a new Copr build, add a comment containing new Spec and SRPM URLs or [fedora-review-service-build] string. Copr build: https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/build/6840058 (failed) Build log: https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/@fedora-review/fedora-review-2256303-golang-github-apex-log/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/06840058-golang-github-apex-log/builder-live.log.gz Please make sure the package builds successfully at least for Fedora Rawhide. - If the build failed for unrelated reasons (e.g. temporary network unavailability), please ignore it. - If the build failed because of missing BuildRequires, please make sure they are listed in the "Depends On" field --- This comment was created by the fedora-review-service https://github.com/FrostyX/fedora-review-service If you want to trigger a new Copr build, add a comment containing new Spec and SRPM URLs or [fedora-review-service-build] string. Unretire request: https://pagure.io/releng/issue/11881 Package Review
==============
Package was generated by go2rpm, which simplifies the review.
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
Issues:
=======
Checks:
=======
[x]: Spec file is sane.
[x]: Latest version is packaged.
[x]: License is correct and license file is included.
[x]: %check is present and all tests pass.
[x]: Package builds in mock.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: rpmlint shows no relevant errors.
There are many warnings about duplicate files, but these seem to be needed for testing, so can be ignored.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
Package APPROVED. Please fix the issue above before import.
Post import tasks:
- Add @go-sig with commit or admin access to the package
- If possible, add your package to release-monitoring.org
Sorry for that comment, clipboard error... Just wanted to update the depends. Package is NOT YET APPROVED! This is an automatic check from review-stats script. This review request ticket hasn't been updated for some time, but it seems that the review is still being working out by you. If this is right, please respond to this comment clearing the NEEDINFO flag and try to reach out the submitter to proceed with the review. If you're not interested in reviewing this ticket anymore, please clear the fedora-review flag and reset the assignee, so that a new reviewer can take this ticket. Without any reply, this request will shortly be resetted. This is an automatic action taken by review-stats script. The ticket reviewer failed to clear the NEEDINFO flag in a month. As per https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Policy_for_stalled_package_reviews we reset the status and the assignee of this ticket. |