Bug 2256305

Summary: Review Request: golang-github-aphistic-golf - Client library written in Go for sending messages to Graylog Extended Log Format (GELF) servers
Product: [Fedora] Fedora Reporter: W. Michael Petullo <mike>
Component: Package ReviewAssignee: Nobody's working on this, feel free to take it <nobody>
Status: NEW --- QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity: medium Docs Contact:
Priority: medium    
Version: rawhideCC: arthur, mikel, package-review
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: All   
OS: Linux   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On:    
Bug Blocks: 2256303    

Description W. Michael Petullo 2023-12-31 01:32:01 UTC
Spec URL: https://www.flyn.org/SRPMS/golang-github-aphistic-golf.spec
SRPM URL: https://www.flyn.org/SRPMS/golang-github-aphistic-golf-0-0.1.20231231git02c07f1.fc39.src.rpm
Description: Client library written in Go for sending messages to Graylog Extended Log Format (GELF) servers
Fedora Account System Username: mikep

This was generated using go2rpm and is required for the latest release of Hugo. See COPR builds at https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/mikep/golang/builds/.

Comment 2 Fedora Review Service 2023-12-31 19:17:39 UTC
Copr build:
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/build/6840029
(failed)

Build log:
https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/@fedora-review/fedora-review-2256305-golang-github-aphistic-golf/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/06840029-golang-github-aphistic-golf/builder-live.log.gz

Please make sure the package builds successfully at least for Fedora Rawhide.

- If the build failed for unrelated reasons (e.g. temporary network
  unavailability), please ignore it.
- If the build failed because of missing BuildRequires, please make sure they
  are listed in the "Depends On" field


---
This comment was created by the fedora-review-service
https://github.com/FrostyX/fedora-review-service

If you want to trigger a new Copr build, add a comment containing new
Spec and SRPM URLs or [fedora-review-service-build] string.

Comment 3 Fedora Review Service 2023-12-31 19:19:56 UTC
Copr build:
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/build/6840056
(failed)

Build log:
https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/@fedora-review/fedora-review-2256305-golang-github-aphistic-golf/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/06840056-golang-github-aphistic-golf/builder-live.log.gz

Please make sure the package builds successfully at least for Fedora Rawhide.

- If the build failed for unrelated reasons (e.g. temporary network
  unavailability), please ignore it.
- If the build failed because of missing BuildRequires, please make sure they
  are listed in the "Depends On" field


---
This comment was created by the fedora-review-service
https://github.com/FrostyX/fedora-review-service

If you want to trigger a new Copr build, add a comment containing new
Spec and SRPM URLs or [fedora-review-service-build] string.

Comment 4 Mikel Olasagasti Uranga 2024-01-16 08:09:47 UTC
Is this required for hugo? I can't see it required in the code, nor your copr build.

Comment 5 Arthur Bols 2024-02-01 19:37:14 UTC
I looked into the tests and it looks like they were added in this commit: https://github.com/aphistic/golf/commit/eb9324 .
Nothing meaningful changed since then (some CI fixes), so I suggest packaging the commit before the switch to sweet: https://github.com/aphistic/golf/commit/b8be15 .
log_test.go and log_default_test.go still fail, but you can easily fix them or just disable them.

Comment 6 W. Michael Petullo 2024-02-01 20:53:34 UTC
Spec URL: https://www.flyn.org/SRPMS/golang-github-aphistic-golf.spec
SRPM URL: https://www.flyn.org/SRPMS/golang-github-aphistic-golf-0-0.1.20240201gitb8be15e.fc39.src.rpm

Package older version to avoid golang-github-aphistic-sweet, which we cannot package. See https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2256306 for why.

Thank you, Arthur, for the suggestion!

> Is this required for hugo? I can't see it required in the code, nor your
> copr build.

Yes. The dependency is hugo -> github.com/bep/logg -> github.com/apex/log -> github.com/aphistic/golf.

Comment 7 Fedora Review Service 2024-02-01 20:57:06 UTC
Copr build:
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/build/6980580
(succeeded)

Review template:
https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/@fedora-review/fedora-review-2256305-golang-github-aphistic-golf/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/06980580-golang-github-aphistic-golf/fedora-review/review.txt

Please take a look if any issues were found.


---
This comment was created by the fedora-review-service
https://github.com/FrostyX/fedora-review-service

If you want to trigger a new Copr build, add a comment containing new
Spec and SRPM URLs or [fedora-review-service-build] string.

Comment 8 Arthur Bols 2024-02-21 16:01:15 UTC
Thanks for the update.

Some issues I found:

- Enable tests (remove `-d .`)
  You will have to remove/fix the `log_default_test.go` and `log_test.go` files as these can't be compiled.

- Summary is too long

Otherwise looking good!

Comment 9 Package Review 2025-02-21 00:45:27 UTC
This is an automatic check from review-stats script.

This review request ticket hasn't been updated for some time, but it seems
that the review is still being working out by you. If this is right, please
respond to this comment clearing the NEEDINFO flag and try to reach out the
submitter to proceed with the review.

If you're not interested in reviewing this ticket anymore, please clear the
fedora-review flag and reset the assignee, so that a new reviewer can take
this ticket.

Without any reply, this request will shortly be resetted.

Comment 10 Package Review 2025-03-24 00:45:21 UTC
This is an automatic action taken by review-stats script.

The ticket reviewer failed to clear the NEEDINFO flag in a month.
As per https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Policy_for_stalled_package_reviews
we reset the status and the assignee of this ticket.