Bug 225657

Summary: Merge Review: cpufrequtils
Product: [Fedora] Fedora Reporter: Nobody's working on this, feel free to take it <nobody>
Component: Package ReviewAssignee: Nobody's working on this, feel free to take it <nobody>
Status: CLOSED NOTABUG QA Contact: Fedora Package Reviews List <fedora-package-review>
Severity: medium Docs Contact:
Priority: medium    
Version: rawhideCC: anton, jarod, kevin, opensource
Target Milestone: ---Flags: kevin: fedora-cvs+
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: All   
OS: Linux   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2013-06-15 04:00:09 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:

Description Nobody's working on this, feel free to take it 2007-01-31 17:52:14 UTC
Fedora Merge Review: cpufreq-utils

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/cpufreq-utils/
Initial Owner: lizhang@redhat.com

Comment 1 Jarod Wilson 2008-06-02 16:15:31 UTC
Package Change Request
======================
Package Name: cpufreq-utils

I want to rename the package to cpufrequtils, to match the upstream package name.

http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/utils/kernel/cpufreq/cpufrequtils.html

Comment 2 Kevin Fenzi 2008-06-02 19:05:33 UTC
We dislike doing renames of packages with history... 

Would you be ok with adding the new package name and following the 
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/PackageEndOfLife
procedure on the old package?

That way people can find the old package, and know what happened to it more
clearly. 

Comment 3 Kevin Fenzi 2008-06-02 20:07:02 UTC
Per irc conversion, I have created the new cpufrequtils package, and you can end
of life the old cpufreq-utils package. 

cvs done.

Comment 4 Jason Tibbitts 2008-12-19 06:27:10 UTC
I'm pretty sure this still needs a merge review under the new name.

Comment 5 Till Maas 2009-09-16 23:54:32 UTC
- The patches need comments wrt their upstream status:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#All_patches_should_have_an_upstream_bug_link_or_comment

- You need to either use $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/$RPM_OPT_FLAGS or %{buildroot}/%{optflags}, but currently both styles are used:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Using_.25.7Bbuildroot.7D_and_.25.7Boptflags.7D_vs_.24RPM_BUILD_ROOT_and_.24RPM_OPT_FLAGS

I'll try to perform a full review soon.

Comment 6 Jason Tibbitts 2013-06-15 04:00:09 UTC
This package is dead as of F17; closing this ancient ticket.