| Summary: | Merge Review: cpufrequtils | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Nobody's working on this, feel free to take it <nobody> |
| Component: | Package Review | Assignee: | Nobody's working on this, feel free to take it <nobody> |
| Status: | CLOSED NOTABUG | QA Contact: | Fedora Package Reviews List <fedora-package-review> |
| Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | medium | ||
| Version: | rawhide | CC: | anton, jarod, kevin, opensource |
| Target Milestone: | --- | Flags: | kevin:
fedora-cvs+
|
| Target Release: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | All | ||
| OS: | Linux | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2013-06-15 04:00:09 UTC | Type: | --- |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
|
Description
Nobody's working on this, feel free to take it
2007-01-31 17:52:14 UTC
Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: cpufreq-utils I want to rename the package to cpufrequtils, to match the upstream package name. http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/utils/kernel/cpufreq/cpufrequtils.html We dislike doing renames of packages with history... Would you be ok with adding the new package name and following the http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/PackageEndOfLife procedure on the old package? That way people can find the old package, and know what happened to it more clearly. Per irc conversion, I have created the new cpufrequtils package, and you can end of life the old cpufreq-utils package. cvs done. I'm pretty sure this still needs a merge review under the new name. - The patches need comments wrt their upstream status: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#All_patches_should_have_an_upstream_bug_link_or_comment - You need to either use $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/$RPM_OPT_FLAGS or %{buildroot}/%{optflags}, but currently both styles are used: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Using_.25.7Bbuildroot.7D_and_.25.7Boptflags.7D_vs_.24RPM_BUILD_ROOT_and_.24RPM_OPT_FLAGS I'll try to perform a full review soon. This package is dead as of F17; closing this ancient ticket. |