Bug 225657 - Merge Review: cpufrequtils
Summary: Merge Review: cpufrequtils
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED NOTABUG
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: Package Review
Version: rawhide
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
medium
medium
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Nobody's working on this, feel free to take it
QA Contact: Fedora Package Reviews List
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2007-01-31 17:52 UTC by Nobody's working on this, feel free to take it
Modified: 2013-06-15 04:00 UTC (History)
4 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2013-06-15 04:00:09 UTC
Type: ---
kevin: fedora-cvs+


Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Nobody's working on this, feel free to take it 2007-01-31 17:52:14 UTC
Fedora Merge Review: cpufreq-utils

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/cpufreq-utils/
Initial Owner: lizhang@redhat.com

Comment 1 Jarod Wilson 2008-06-02 16:15:31 UTC
Package Change Request
======================
Package Name: cpufreq-utils

I want to rename the package to cpufrequtils, to match the upstream package name.

http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/utils/kernel/cpufreq/cpufrequtils.html

Comment 2 Kevin Fenzi 2008-06-02 19:05:33 UTC
We dislike doing renames of packages with history... 

Would you be ok with adding the new package name and following the 
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/PackageEndOfLife
procedure on the old package?

That way people can find the old package, and know what happened to it more
clearly. 

Comment 3 Kevin Fenzi 2008-06-02 20:07:02 UTC
Per irc conversion, I have created the new cpufrequtils package, and you can end
of life the old cpufreq-utils package. 

cvs done.

Comment 4 Jason Tibbitts 2008-12-19 06:27:10 UTC
I'm pretty sure this still needs a merge review under the new name.

Comment 5 Till Maas 2009-09-16 23:54:32 UTC
- The patches need comments wrt their upstream status:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#All_patches_should_have_an_upstream_bug_link_or_comment

- You need to either use $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/$RPM_OPT_FLAGS or %{buildroot}/%{optflags}, but currently both styles are used:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Using_.25.7Bbuildroot.7D_and_.25.7Boptflags.7D_vs_.24RPM_BUILD_ROOT_and_.24RPM_OPT_FLAGS

I'll try to perform a full review soon.

Comment 6 Jason Tibbitts 2013-06-15 04:00:09 UTC
This package is dead as of F17; closing this ancient ticket.


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.