Bug 225657 - Merge Review: cpufrequtils
Merge Review: cpufrequtils
Status: CLOSED NOTABUG
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: Package Review (Show other bugs)
rawhide
All Linux
medium Severity medium
: ---
: ---
Assigned To: Nobody's working on this, feel free to take it
Fedora Package Reviews List
:
Depends On:
Blocks:
  Show dependency treegraph
 
Reported: 2007-01-31 12:52 EST by Nobody's working on this, feel free to take it
Modified: 2013-06-15 00:00 EDT (History)
4 users (show)

See Also:
Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2013-06-15 00:00:09 EDT
Type: ---
Regression: ---
Mount Type: ---
Documentation: ---
CRM:
Verified Versions:
Category: ---
oVirt Team: ---
RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: ---
kevin: fedora‑cvs+


Attachments (Terms of Use)

  None (edit)
Description Nobody's working on this, feel free to take it 2007-01-31 12:52:14 EST
Fedora Merge Review: cpufreq-utils

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/cpufreq-utils/
Initial Owner: lizhang@redhat.com
Comment 1 Jarod Wilson 2008-06-02 12:15:31 EDT
Package Change Request
======================
Package Name: cpufreq-utils

I want to rename the package to cpufrequtils, to match the upstream package name.

http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/utils/kernel/cpufreq/cpufrequtils.html
Comment 2 Kevin Fenzi 2008-06-02 15:05:33 EDT
We dislike doing renames of packages with history... 

Would you be ok with adding the new package name and following the 
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/PackageEndOfLife
procedure on the old package?

That way people can find the old package, and know what happened to it more
clearly. 
Comment 3 Kevin Fenzi 2008-06-02 16:07:02 EDT
Per irc conversion, I have created the new cpufrequtils package, and you can end
of life the old cpufreq-utils package. 

cvs done.
Comment 4 Jason Tibbitts 2008-12-19 01:27:10 EST
I'm pretty sure this still needs a merge review under the new name.
Comment 5 Till Maas 2009-09-16 19:54:32 EDT
- The patches need comments wrt their upstream status:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#All_patches_should_have_an_upstream_bug_link_or_comment

- You need to either use $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/$RPM_OPT_FLAGS or %{buildroot}/%{optflags}, but currently both styles are used:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Using_.25.7Bbuildroot.7D_and_.25.7Boptflags.7D_vs_.24RPM_BUILD_ROOT_and_.24RPM_OPT_FLAGS

I'll try to perform a full review soon.
Comment 6 Jason Tibbitts 2013-06-15 00:00:09 EDT
This package is dead as of F17; closing this ancient ticket.

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.