Bug 225895

Summary: Merge Review: icon-slicer
Product: [Fedora] Fedora Reporter: Nobody's working on this, feel free to take it <nobody>
Component: Package ReviewAssignee: David Zeuthen <davidz>
Status: CLOSED WONTFIX QA Contact: Fedora Package Reviews List <fedora-package-review>
Severity: medium Docs Contact:
Priority: medium    
Version: rawhideCC: davidz, mclasen, roozbeh, rstrode
Target Milestone: ---Flags: roozbeh: fedora-review-
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: All   
OS: Linux   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2007-10-02 13:44:53 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description Nobody's working on this, feel free to take it 2007-01-31 19:04:42 UTC 
Fedora Merge Review: icon-slicer

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/icon-slicer/
Initial Owner: davidz
Comment 1 Roozbeh Pournader 2007-02-06 10:38:36 UTC 
Random first notes:
* change BuildPrereq to BuildRequires
* change Release to integer value, perhaps also using %{?dist}
* change BuildRoot to %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n)
* License field says MIT, but there is a copy of GPL in the tarball named COPYING!
* ship at least ChangeLog and AUTHORS in %doc
* use make DESTDIR=$RPM_BUILD_ROOT install instead of %makeinstall
* change %defattr(-,root,root) to %defattr(-,root,root,-)
* use make %{?_smp_mflags} instead of make
* provide URL field
* provide complete URL of source tarball in the Source field
Comment 2 Matthias Clasen 2007-10-02 04:02:28 UTC 
Ray, do any of the split art packages still BR icon-slicer ?

If not, we should just drop it.
Comment 3 Ray Strode [halfline] 2007-10-02 13:44:53 UTC 
the icon sheets/ icon slicer stuff was just plain weird.  I packaged the icons
split up from the get go.