Bug 225992
Summary: | Merge Review: libcap | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Nobody's working on this, feel free to take it <nobody> |
Component: | Package Review | Assignee: | Parag AN(पराग) <panemade> |
Status: | CLOSED RAWHIDE | QA Contact: | Fedora Package Reviews List <fedora-package-review> |
Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | medium | ||
Version: | rawhide | CC: | karsten, redhat-bugzilla |
Target Milestone: | --- | Flags: | panemade:
fedora-review+
|
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2008-01-16 09:30:05 UTC | Type: | --- |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: | |||
Bug Depends On: | |||
Bug Blocks: | 426387 |
Description
Nobody's working on this, feel free to take it
2007-01-31 19:19:38 UTC
libcap-1.10-28 has some common review issues fixed can't see license file installed. cp commands in SPEC should be used as "cp -p" ping? diff -r1.27 libcap.spec 3c3 < Release: 30 --- > Release: 31 65c65 < cp %{SOURCE1} doc/ --- > cp -p %{SOURCE1} doc/ 76c76 < %doc doc/capability.notes doc/capfaq-0.2.txt --- > %doc doc/capability.notes doc/capfaq-0.2.txt License SHOULD: 1)Though not mandatory you can add disttag. 2)Remove following Requires(post): /sbin/ldconfig Requires(postun): /sbin/ldconfig 3) Good to have defattr used as now %defattr(-,root,root,-) 4) Correct changelog version. Sorry that I should I asked this previously before you built new release. Can you please do that again. Once above issues fixed in CVS. This package will be approved. - I've added disttag - Why should I remove the requirements ? The package runs ldconfig in post and postun and needs to require them. Or is there any new guideline that I'm not aware of ? If so, can you give me a pointer to it ? - defattr changed to -,root,root,- new package is libcap-1.10-32.fc9 (In reply to comment #6) > - I've added disttag > - Why should I remove the requirements ? The package runs ldconfig in post and > postun and needs to require them. Or is there any new guideline that I'm not > aware of ? If so, can you give me a pointer to it ? > - defattr changed to -,root,root,- > > new package is libcap-1.10-32.fc9 Thanks. I saw http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ScriptletSnippets#head-d0dbcb7eec27622a21df280009c5b089b02f5bef requirements are not mentioned there and even newer packages that got reviewed are not using that syntax. You're right, the '%post -p' syntax will get parsed by find-requires and it isn't necessary to add that requirement manually (although it doesn't do any harm either) (In reply to comment #8) > You're right, the '%post -p' syntax will get parsed by find-requires and it > isn't necessary to add that requirement manually (although it doesn't do any > harm either) Ok. But I still want you to remove it next time you build this package. APPROVED. rebuilding such small packages isn't a problem. Fixed in libcap-1.10-33.fc9 Thanks. APPROVED. |