Bug 226044

Summary:	Merge Review: libsepol
Product:	[Fedora] Fedora	Reporter:	Nobody's working on this, feel free to take it <nobody>
Component:	Package Review	Assignee:	Adel Gadllah <adel.gadllah>
Status:	CLOSED RAWHIDE	QA Contact:	Fedora Package Reviews List <fedora-package-review>
Severity:	medium	Docs Contact:
Priority:	medium
Version:	rawhide	CC:	adel.gadllah, dwalsh, redhat-bugzilla
Target Milestone:	---	Flags:	adel.gadllah: fedora-review+
Target Release:	---
Hardware:	All
OS:	Linux
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:		Doc Type:	Bug Fix
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:
Last Closed:	2008-01-21 22:19:45 UTC	Type:	---
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On:
Bug Blocks:	426387

Description Nobody's working on this, feel free to take it 2007-01-31 19:27:41 UTC

Fedora Merge Review: libsepol

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/libsepol/
Initial Owner: dwalsh

Comment 1 Adel Gadllah 2008-01-04 00:42:58 UTC

rpmlint output: 
"libsepol.x86_64: W: no-documentation"
looks good !

------------------

Comments on the spec file:

> Provides: libsepol.so

Why is this needed?

------------------

>%build
>make clean
>make CFLAGS="%{optflags}"

Please append %{?_smp_mflags}

------------------

>%files devel
>%defattr(-,root,root)
>%{_libdir}/libsepol.a

Either remove this file or create a -static package if it needs to be shipped
for some reason.

Comment 2 Adel Gadllah 2008-01-15 16:55:12 UTC

ping?

Comment 3 Daniel Walsh 2008-01-21 20:37:45 UTC

No one is using the libsepol-devel library without needing the libsepol.a file.

Comment 4 Daniel Walsh 2008-01-21 20:45:00 UTC

Updates applied in

libsepol-2.0.7-2

Comment 5 Adel Gadllah 2008-01-21 21:51:35 UTC

(In reply to comment #4)
> Updates applied in
> 
> libsepol-2.0.7-2

Package looks fine now.

=> APPROVED!