Bug 226044 - Merge Review: libsepol
Summary: Merge Review: libsepol
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED RAWHIDE
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: Package Review
Version: rawhide
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
medium
medium
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Adel Gadllah
QA Contact: Fedora Package Reviews List
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks: F9MergeReviewTarget
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2007-01-31 19:27 UTC by Nobody's working on this, feel free to take it
Modified: 2008-01-21 22:19 UTC (History)
3 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2008-01-21 22:19:45 UTC
Type: ---
Embargoed:
adel.gadllah: fedora-review+

Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Nobody's working on this, feel free to take it 2007-01-31 19:27:41 UTC 
Fedora Merge Review: libsepol

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/libsepol/
Initial Owner: dwalsh
Comment 1 Adel Gadllah 2008-01-04 00:42:58 UTC 
rpmlint output: 
"libsepol.x86_64: W: no-documentation"
looks good !

------------------

Comments on the spec file:

> Provides: libsepol.so

Why is this needed?

------------------

>%build
>make clean
>make CFLAGS="%{optflags}"

Please append %{?_smp_mflags}

------------------

>%files devel
>%defattr(-,root,root)
>%{_libdir}/libsepol.a

Either remove this file or create a -static package if it needs to be shipped
for some reason.
Comment 2 Adel Gadllah 2008-01-15 16:55:12 UTC 
ping?
Comment 3 Daniel Walsh 2008-01-21 20:37:45 UTC 
No one is using the libsepol-devel library without needing the libsepol.a file.
Comment 4 Daniel Walsh 2008-01-21 20:45:00 UTC 
Updates applied in

libsepol-2.0.7-2
Comment 5 Adel Gadllah 2008-01-21 21:51:35 UTC 
(In reply to comment #4)
> Updates applied in
> 
> libsepol-2.0.7-2

Package looks fine now.

=> APPROVED!
Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.