Bug 226060
| Summary: | Merge Review: libwpd | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Nobody's working on this, feel free to take it <nobody> |
| Component: | Package Review | Assignee: | Thomas Spura <tomspur> |
| Status: | CLOSED RAWHIDE | QA Contact: | Fedora Package Reviews List <fedora-package-review> |
| Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | medium | ||
| Version: | rawhide | CC: | caolanm, tomspur |
| Target Milestone: | --- | Flags: | tomspur:
fedora-review+
|
| Target Release: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | All | ||
| OS: | Linux | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2010-07-19 13:58:07 UTC | Type: | --- |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
| Embargoed: | |||
|
Description
Nobody's working on this, feel free to take it
2007-01-31 19:29:05 UTC
$ rpmlint ./libwpd-0.8.14-4.fc13.src.rpm x86_64/libwpd-* libwpd-tools.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US html -> HTML, ht ml, ht-ml libwpd-tools.x86_64: E: binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath /usr/bin/wpd2text ['/usr/lib64'] libwpd-tools.x86_64: E: binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath /usr/bin/wpd2html ['/usr/lib64'] libwpd-tools.x86_64: E: binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath /usr/bin/wpd2raw ['/usr/lib64'] libwpd-tools.x86_64: W: no-documentation libwpd-tools.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary wpd2raw libwpd-tools.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary wpd2html libwpd-tools.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary wpd2text 5 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 3 errors, 5 warnings. See: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Removing_Rpath - please add a %check section (needs BR cppunit-devel): %check make check - in %description tools: Could be that there is a '(tm)' missing behind 'WordPerfect', isn't it? (Same in main package) Anything else looks ok: - name ok - license ok - group ok - libs correctly installed - no locales - no static libs - parallel make - %files ok - subpackages require main package implicitely - no *.la a) E: binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath done as libwpd-0.8.14-5.fc14 b) make check done as libwpd-0.8.14-5.fc14 c) (tm) as per http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingGuidelines#Trademarks_in_Summary_or_Description removed it altogether, done as libwpd-0.8.14-5.fc14 Great. New rpmlint: $ rpmlint ./libwpd-0.8.14-5.fc13.src.rpm x86_64/libwpd-* libwpd-tools.x86_64: W: no-documentation libwpd-tools.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary wpd2raw libwpd-tools.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary wpd2html libwpd-tools.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary wpd2text 5 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 4 warnings. All ignorable. ________________________________________________________________________________ APPROVED |