Bug 226158
Summary: | Merge Review: mono | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Nobody's working on this, feel free to take it <nobody> |
Component: | mono | Assignee: | Nobody's working on this, feel free to take it <nobody> |
Status: | CLOSED EOL | QA Contact: | Fedora Package Reviews List <fedora-package-review> |
Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | medium | ||
Version: | 23 | CC: | alexl, chkr, claudiorodrigo, cristian.ciupitu, itamar, kevin, kirbyzhou, lxtnow, mattdm, paul |
Target Milestone: | --- | Flags: | kevin:
fedora-cvs+
|
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2016-12-20 11:58:42 UTC | Type: | --- |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: | |||
Bug Depends On: | 1089426, 1220138 | ||
Bug Blocks: |
Description
Nobody's working on this, feel free to take it
2007-01-31 19:43:06 UTC
CVS Change Request =================== Package name : mono Initial Owner : Alexll New Branch : EL-5 Alexl: could we get an ack that you want to maintain this in EPEL? need fas account names not email addresses If Alex doesn't want to maintain this (or any other mono based packages in EPEL), I'm more than happy to step up to the plate... I'll email him. I need some mono and other mono based packages in epel branch in order to build some mine. So, Paul, if you want to co-maintain too, you're welcome ;) Which packages are needed? I don't have time to do any mono work for EPEL, its fine for Xavier and Paul to take these. Thanks Alexander. Paul, we'll talk about it on ML or somewhere else if you don't mind. CVS Change Request =================== Package name : mono Owners : alexl, laxathom New branch : EL-5 cvs done. Should I not be down as an owner on this? Paul: Sorry, I didn't see you in the request. Can you use the pkgdb web interface to request it, or put another cvs request here if you prefer a cvsadmin to do it? CVS Change Request ================== Package name : mono Updated Initial Owner : laxathom Comment : Taking over ownership Appears to be done. Note that on the mailing list David Nielsen already said he would maintain this package. Please check with him and make sure he's got the access he needs. mono-1.2 is very very old, we want to deploy mono-2.4 in our linux servers. But it is missing in EPEL5. I here trouble the maintainers backport the whole mono-2.4 series to RHEL5. Thanks Package Change Request =================== Package name : mono Owners : alexl, laxathom New branch : EL-5-2.4 Mass reassigning all merge reviews to their component. For more details, see this FESCO ticket: https://fedorahosted.org/fesco/ticket/1269 If you don't know what merge reviews are about, please see: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Merge_Reviews How to handle this bug is left to the discretion of the package maintainer. Mono in repos is very old , to build Mono we require Mono :) and we can't build newest Mono unless we use intermediate.. I can help in this strategy, and I requested a reach to Mono repo to update it, More than month and Still waiting. (In reply to Mosaab Alzoubi from comment #16) > Mono in repos is very old I think you need to report another bug requesting an upgrade. This bug appears to have been reported against 'rawhide' during the Fedora 23 development cycle. Changing version to '23'. (As we did not run this process for some time, it could affect also pre-Fedora 23 development cycle bugs. We are very sorry. It will help us with cleanup during Fedora 23 End Of Life. Thank you.) More information and reason for this action is here: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/HouseKeeping/Fedora23 This message is a reminder that Fedora 23 is nearing its end of life. Approximately 4 (four) weeks from now Fedora will stop maintaining and issuing updates for Fedora 23. It is Fedora's policy to close all bug reports from releases that are no longer maintained. At that time this bug will be closed as EOL if it remains open with a Fedora 'version' of '23'. Package Maintainer: If you wish for this bug to remain open because you plan to fix it in a currently maintained version, simply change the 'version' to a later Fedora version. Thank you for reporting this issue and we are sorry that we were not able to fix it before Fedora 23 is end of life. If you would still like to see this bug fixed and are able to reproduce it against a later version of Fedora, you are encouraged change the 'version' to a later Fedora version prior this bug is closed as described in the policy above. Although we aim to fix as many bugs as possible during every release's lifetime, sometimes those efforts are overtaken by events. Often a more recent Fedora release includes newer upstream software that fixes bugs or makes them obsolete. Fedora 23 changed to end-of-life (EOL) status on 2016-12-20. Fedora 23 is no longer maintained, which means that it will not receive any further security or bug fix updates. As a result we are closing this bug. If you can reproduce this bug against a currently maintained version of Fedora please feel free to reopen this bug against that version. If you are unable to reopen this bug, please file a new report against the current release. If you experience problems, please add a comment to this bug. Thank you for reporting this bug and we are sorry it could not be fixed. |