Fedora Account System
Red Hat Associate
Red Hat Customer
Debian stable literally has newer versions of both Mono and especially MonoDevelop. Don't even get me started on testing and unstable...
Yeah, the 3.x series has been out for a couple of years now. It would be nice to jump up to the latest release for F21.
I also desperately need a more current mono version. I need this mainly for arm platform (RasPI, pidora).
The open-source game OpenRA (http://openra.net/) runs into issues which the devs told me are most likely due to the old mono version. Is mono for Fedora still actively maintained?
I need it for Repetier 1.06 http://www.repetier.com/downloads/
*** Bug 1164015 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
This bug appears to have been reported against 'rawhide' during the Fedora 22 development cycle. Changing version to '22'. More information and reason for this action is here: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_Program_Management/HouseKeeping/Fedora22
marking rawhide/FutureFeature, to avoid autoclose/auto-rebase of the bug
mono-core-3.12.1-0.src.rpm from http://download.mono-project.com/repo/centos/SRPMS/ built successfully for F21: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=9392781 It failed against rawhide: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=9392925
(In reply to Moez Roy from comment #8) Is the recent build failure related to that patch? http://static-173-79-223-25.washdc.fios.verizon.net/?l=mono-patches&m=138211276301187&q=raw
Maybe also … https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/mono-svn-patches/qQrKoyt-j9A Should undefine HAVE_KW_THREAD? https://marc.info/?l=mono-patches&m=124571096012427 This is what Google gives me as helpfully looking links so far.
(In reply to Raphael Groner from comment #9) > (In reply to Moez Roy from comment #8) > > Is the recent build failure related to that patch? > http://static-173-79-223-25.washdc.fios.verizon.net/?l=mono- > patches&m=138211276301187&q=raw (In reply to Raphael Groner from comment #10) > Maybe also … > https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/mono-svn-patches/qQrKoyt-j9A > > Should undefine HAVE_KW_THREAD? > https://marc.info/?l=mono-patches&m=124571096012427 > > This is what Google gives me as helpfully looking links so far. I have no clue. I am not motivated enough to look more into this right now. Can you try and see if you can build it for rawhide?
Mono 4.0.0 Release Notes: "We no longer build or package reference assemblies for the .NET 2.0, .NET 3.5 or .NET 4.0 APIs. We only support now the .NET 4.5 assemblies as well as the mobile-based profiles." http://www.mono-project.com/docs/about-mono/releases/4.0.0/ What's the strategical plan in Fedora?
(In reply to Moez Roy from comment #8) It seems that Mono 4.0 Alpha1 builds fine on Rawhide: https://copr.fedoraproject.org/coprs/elsupergomez/mono-4/build/85185/ I tried to find the difference in the Mono github repository, but was not able to find it. mono/mini/mini.c has been split, and the function mono_get_jit_tls_offset now lives in https://github.com/mono/mono/blob/master/mono/mini/mini-runtime.c#L674 but still looks the same as in 3.12.1: https://github.com/mono/mono/blob/mono-3.12.1/mono/mini/mini.c#L2638
Mono 4 is now in Fedora 23 Beta, see official announcement. Can we so close this bug as a duplication of bug #1221559 ?
(In reply to Raphael Groner from comment #14) > Mono 4 is now in Fedora 23 Beta, see official announcement. > > Can we so close this bug as a duplication of bug #1221559 ? Maybe close as Next Release ? is another option.
I'm going to close this, IMO it's too evasive to push back to F-22, F-21 will be EOL in around a month. Those that wish to use mono are strongly advised to upgrade to Fedora 23 which is now GA.