Bug 226649

Summary:	Merge Review: xorg-x11-xbitmaps
Product:	[Fedora] Fedora	Reporter:	Nobody's working on this, feel free to take it <nobody>
Component:	Package Review	Assignee:	Parag AN(पराग) <panemade>
Status:	CLOSED NEXTRELEASE	QA Contact:	Fedora Package Reviews List <fedora-package-review>
Severity:	medium	Docs Contact:
Priority:	medium
Version:	rawhide	CC:	ajax, panemade, sandmann, tomspur
Target Milestone:	---	Keywords:	Reopened
Target Release:	---	Flags:	panemade: fedora-review+
Hardware:	All
OS:	Linux
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:		Doc Type:	Bug Fix
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:
Last Closed:	2010-10-28 05:41:51 UTC	Type:	---
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description Nobody's working on this, feel free to take it 2007-01-31 21:34:11 UTC

Fedora Merge Review: xorg-x11-xbitmaps

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/xorg-x11-xbitmaps/
Initial Owner: sandmann

Comment 1 Thomas Spura 2009-12-19 21:52:56 UTC

$ rpmlint xorg-x11-xbitmaps.spec xorg-x11-xbitmaps-1.1.0-1.fc13.src.rpm noarch/xorg-x11-xbitmaps-1.1.0-1.fc13.noarch.rpm 
xorg-x11-xbitmaps.spec:17: W: unversioned-explicit-provides xbitmaps
xorg-x11-xbitmaps.spec:18: W: unversioned-explicit-provides xbitmaps-devel
xorg-x11-xbitmaps.src:17: W: unversioned-explicit-provides xbitmaps
xorg-x11-xbitmaps.src:18: W: unversioned-explicit-provides xbitmaps-devel
xorg-x11-xbitmaps.noarch: W: no-documentation
xorg-x11-xbitmaps.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/share/pkgconfig/xbitmaps.pc
2 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 6 warnings.

- There is ChangeLog and COPYING for %doc.

- Isn't %configure and --libdir a bit hacky?
  You assume, that the latest used --libdir is used in the configure. Don't know
  if that's always the case. Hope so ;)

- Could the provides xbitmaps deleted, if bitmaps requires xorg-x11-xbitmaps and not xbitmaps anymore?
  AFAIK this is the only programm which uses 'xbitmaps'

  $ repoquery --whatrequires xbitmaps
    bitmap-0:1.0.3-6.fc12.x86_64

- parallel make is not really needed, because nothing is build in make, but could you use 'make %{?_smp_mflags}' anyway?

- from https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Pkgconfig_Files
  requires: pkgconfig is missing


Rest looks ok.

Comment 2 Thomas Spura 2009-12-19 21:56:07 UTC

Hmm, just wondering, which package owns /usr/include/X11

$ yum provides /usr/include/X11 says:
xorg-x11-proto-devel and xorg-x11-xtrans-devel

But this package should require a programm, for owning /usr/include/X11, but those two don't make sense...

Comment 3 Thomas Spura 2010-01-26 23:37:45 UTC

CC'ing Adam Jackson

Comment 4 Adam Jackson 2010-08-30 20:15:56 UTC

(In reply to comment #1)

> - Isn't %configure and --libdir a bit hacky?
>   You assume, that the latest used --libdir is used in the configure. Don't
> know
>   if that's always the case. Hope so ;)

It is.

Fixed the doc stuff and smp_mflags in F15.  The rest is minor enough to not need fixing; if a provenpackager wants to clean that up, feel free.

Comment 5 Parag AN(पराग) 2010-08-31 01:38:58 UTC

where is the official review?

Comment 6 Parag AN(पराग) 2010-09-01 13:35:57 UTC

I will leave this package to be reviewed by Thomas Spura as he has done some initial review.

Comment 7 Parag AN(पराग) 2010-10-28 05:41:51 UTC

Now all the 3 packages(xorg-x11-xbitmaps, xorg-x11-proto-devel and xorg-x11-xtrans-devel) own /usr/include/X11

Done some cleanup commits already.

APPROVED.

Comment 8 Parag AN(पराग) 2012-06-15 16:33:28 UTC

hah! howcome i missed this package to set the flag fedora-review+ ?