Bug 226649 – Merge Review: xorg-x11-xbitmaps

Bugzilla will be upgraded to version 5.0 on a still to be determined date in the near future. The original upgrade date has been delayed.

Bug 226649 - Merge Review: xorg-x11-xbitmaps

Summary:	Merge Review: xorg-x11-xbitmaps

Status:	CLOSED NEXTRELEASE

Aliases:	None

Product:	Fedora
Classification:	Fedora
Component:	Package Review (Show other bugs)
Sub Component:
Version:	rawhide
Hardware:	All Linux

Priority	medium Severity medium
Target Milestone:	---
Target Release:	---
Assigned To:	Parag AN(पराग)
QA Contact:	Fedora Package Reviews List
Docs Contact:

URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:	Reopened

Depends On:
Blocks:
	Show dependency tree / graph

Reported:	2007-01-31 16:34 EST by Nobody's working on this, feel free to take it
Modified:	2012-06-15 12:33 EDT (History)
CC List:	4 users (show)

See Also:
Fixed In Version:
Doc Type:	Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points:	---
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed:	2010-10-28 01:41:51 EDT
Type:	---
Regression:	---
Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---
CRM:
Verified Versions:
Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---
RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---

Flags:	panemade: fedora‑review+

Attachments	(Terms of Use)
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Groups: None (edit)

Description Nobody's working on this, feel free to take it 2007-01-31 16:34:11 EST

Fedora Merge Review: xorg-x11-xbitmaps

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/xorg-x11-xbitmaps/
Initial Owner: sandmann@redhat.com

Comment 1 Thomas Spura 2009-12-19 16:52:56 EST

$ rpmlint xorg-x11-xbitmaps.spec xorg-x11-xbitmaps-1.1.0-1.fc13.src.rpm noarch/xorg-x11-xbitmaps-1.1.0-1.fc13.noarch.rpm 
xorg-x11-xbitmaps.spec:17: W: unversioned-explicit-provides xbitmaps
xorg-x11-xbitmaps.spec:18: W: unversioned-explicit-provides xbitmaps-devel
xorg-x11-xbitmaps.src:17: W: unversioned-explicit-provides xbitmaps
xorg-x11-xbitmaps.src:18: W: unversioned-explicit-provides xbitmaps-devel
xorg-x11-xbitmaps.noarch: W: no-documentation
xorg-x11-xbitmaps.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/share/pkgconfig/xbitmaps.pc
2 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 6 warnings.

- There is ChangeLog and COPYING for %doc.

- Isn't %configure and --libdir a bit hacky?
  You assume, that the latest used --libdir is used in the configure. Don't know
  if that's always the case. Hope so ;)

- Could the provides xbitmaps deleted, if bitmaps requires xorg-x11-xbitmaps and not xbitmaps anymore?
  AFAIK this is the only programm which uses 'xbitmaps'

  $ repoquery --whatrequires xbitmaps
    bitmap-0:1.0.3-6.fc12.x86_64

- parallel make is not really needed, because nothing is build in make, but could you use 'make %{?_smp_mflags}' anyway?

- from https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Pkgconfig_Files
  requires: pkgconfig is missing


Rest looks ok.

Comment 2 Thomas Spura 2009-12-19 16:56:07 EST

Hmm, just wondering, which package owns /usr/include/X11

$ yum provides /usr/include/X11 says:
xorg-x11-proto-devel and xorg-x11-xtrans-devel

But this package should require a programm, for owning /usr/include/X11, but those two don't make sense...

Comment 3 Thomas Spura 2010-01-26 18:37:45 EST

CC'ing Adam Jackson

Comment 4 Adam Jackson 2010-08-30 16:15:56 EDT

(In reply to comment #1)

> - Isn't %configure and --libdir a bit hacky?
>   You assume, that the latest used --libdir is used in the configure. Don't
> know
>   if that's always the case. Hope so ;)

It is.

Fixed the doc stuff and smp_mflags in F15.  The rest is minor enough to not need fixing; if a provenpackager wants to clean that up, feel free.

Comment 5 Parag AN(पराग) 2010-08-30 21:38:58 EDT

where is the official review?

Comment 6 Parag AN(पराग) 2010-09-01 09:35:57 EDT

I will leave this package to be reviewed by Thomas Spura as he has done some initial review.

Comment 7 Parag AN(पराग) 2010-10-28 01:41:51 EDT

Now all the 3 packages(xorg-x11-xbitmaps, xorg-x11-proto-devel and xorg-x11-xtrans-devel) own /usr/include/X11

Done some cleanup commits already.

APPROVED.

Comment 8 Parag AN(पराग) 2012-06-15 12:33:28 EDT

hah! howcome i missed this package to set the flag fedora-review+ ?

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.