Bug 2267207

Summary: [7.0z backport] libcephsqlite may corrupt data from short reads
Product: [Red Hat Storage] Red Hat Ceph Storage Reporter: Bipin Kunal <bkunal>
Component: RADOSAssignee: Patrick Donnelly <pdonnell>
Status: CLOSED DUPLICATE QA Contact: Harsh Kumar <hakumar>
Severity: urgent Docs Contact:
Priority: unspecified    
Version: 6.0CC: bhubbard, ceph-eng-bugs, cephqe-warriors, ngangadh, nojha, pdhiran, pdonnell, sostapov, vumrao
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: 7.0z3   
Hardware: All   
OS: All   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: 2240139 Environment:
Last Closed: 2024-09-19 08:39:13 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On: 2240139    
Bug Blocks: 2233918, 2240143, 2240144    

Description Bipin Kunal 2024-03-01 05:45:33 UTC
+++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #2240139 +++

Description of problem:

See: https://tracker.ceph.com/issues/62492

--- Additional comment from Patrick Donnelly on 2023-09-22 05:34:40 IST ---

https://gitlab.cee.redhat.com/ceph/ceph/-/merge_requests/385

--- Additional comment from Patrick Donnelly on 2023-09-22 05:36:18 IST ---

Neha, I don't know a better component than RADOS for this. I think 7.0z1 is the right target?

I will open 6.X and 5.X series BZs shortly.

--- Additional comment from Patrick Donnelly on 2023-09-22 05:53:11 IST ---



--- Additional comment from Neha Ojha on 2023-12-21 21:10:29 IST ---

(In reply to Patrick Donnelly from comment #2)
> Neha, I don't know a better component than RADOS for this. I think 7.0z1 is
> the right target?
> 
> I will open 6.X and 5.X series BZs shortly.

Sure, based on the severity sounds like this cannot until 7.1

--- Additional comment from Patrick Donnelly on 2024-02-16 03:11:07 IST ---

Fixed by 7.1 rebase on v18.2.1.

Comment 1 Scott Ostapovicz 2024-04-10 13:03:10 UTC
I see the fix is done, but was this back ported to 7.0 z2 already?

Comment 3 Scott Ostapovicz 2024-04-10 15:03:04 UTC
If this has not already been back ported, we should not hold up z2.  Retargeting this to 7.0 z3.