Bug 2267207 - [7.0z backport] libcephsqlite may corrupt data from short reads
Summary: [7.0z backport] libcephsqlite may corrupt data from short reads
Keywords:
Status: ASSIGNED
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat Ceph Storage
Classification: Red Hat Storage
Component: RADOS
Version: 6.0
Hardware: All
OS: All
unspecified
urgent
Target Milestone: ---
: 7.0z3
Assignee: Patrick Donnelly
QA Contact: Harsh Kumar
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On: 2240139
Blocks: 2233918 2240143 2240144
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2024-03-01 05:45 UTC by Bipin Kunal
Modified: 2024-04-10 16:18 UTC (History)
9 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Clone Of: 2240139
Environment:
Last Closed:
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)


Links
System ID Private Priority Status Summary Last Updated
Ceph Project Bug Tracker 62553 0 None None None 2024-04-10 16:18:51 UTC
Red Hat Issue Tracker RHCEPH-8415 0 None None None 2024-03-01 05:56:01 UTC

Description Bipin Kunal 2024-03-01 05:45:33 UTC
+++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #2240139 +++

Description of problem:

See: https://tracker.ceph.com/issues/62492

--- Additional comment from Patrick Donnelly on 2023-09-22 05:34:40 IST ---

https://gitlab.cee.redhat.com/ceph/ceph/-/merge_requests/385

--- Additional comment from Patrick Donnelly on 2023-09-22 05:36:18 IST ---

Neha, I don't know a better component than RADOS for this. I think 7.0z1 is the right target?

I will open 6.X and 5.X series BZs shortly.

--- Additional comment from Patrick Donnelly on 2023-09-22 05:53:11 IST ---



--- Additional comment from Neha Ojha on 2023-12-21 21:10:29 IST ---

(In reply to Patrick Donnelly from comment #2)
> Neha, I don't know a better component than RADOS for this. I think 7.0z1 is
> the right target?
> 
> I will open 6.X and 5.X series BZs shortly.

Sure, based on the severity sounds like this cannot until 7.1

--- Additional comment from Patrick Donnelly on 2024-02-16 03:11:07 IST ---

Fixed by 7.1 rebase on v18.2.1.

Comment 1 Scott Ostapovicz 2024-04-10 13:03:10 UTC
I see the fix is done, but was this back ported to 7.0 z2 already?

Comment 3 Scott Ostapovicz 2024-04-10 15:03:04 UTC
If this has not already been back ported, we should not hold up z2.  Retargeting this to 7.0 z3.


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.