Bug 226942

Summary:	startup crash at /usr/lib64/openoffice.org2.0/program/libuno_sal.so.3 + 0x36708
Product:	[Fedora] Fedora	Reporter:	Stig Hackvan <stig-redhat-bugzilla>
Component:	glibc	Assignee:	Jakub Jelinek <jakub>
Status:	CLOSED DUPLICATE	QA Contact:	Brian Brock <bbrock>
Severity:	medium	Docs Contact:
Priority:	medium
Version:	6	CC:	gilboad, jik, lobo2go
Target Milestone:	---
Target Release:	---
Hardware:	x86_64
OS:	Linux
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:		Doc Type:	Bug Fix
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:
Last Closed:	2007-02-02 09:02:57 UTC	Type:	---
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description Stig Hackvan 2007-02-02 05:44:07 UTC

Description of problem:

unprovoked crash upon startup...  here's the dump:


(I)    x.org loaded video driver of...
(II) Loading /usr/lib64/xorg/modules/drivers/nvidia_drv.so
(III)  Desktop is: GNOME
(IV)   libgcj version is: libgcj-4.1.1-51.fc6-i386 libgcj-4.1.1-51.fc6-x86_64
(V)    kernel is: Linux 2.6.19-1.2895.fc6 #1 SMP Wed Jan 10 18:50:56 EST 2007
x86_64 x86_64 x86_64
(VI)   OpenOffice.org core rpm version is: openoffice.org-core-2.0.4-5.5.10-x86_64
(VII)  depth of root window:    24 planes
(VIII) accessibility is: false
(VIV)  fedora release is: Fedora Core release 6 (Zod)
...start sestatus details ...
SELinux status:                 disabled
...end sestatus details ...
...start stackreport details ...
0xeca36708: /usr/lib64/openoffice.org2.0/program/libuno_sal.so.3 + 0x36708
0xeca3718b: /usr/lib64/openoffice.org2.0/program/libuno_sal.so.3 + 0x3718b
0xe3030210: /lib64/libc.so.6 + 0x30210
0xe2c08de5: /lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2 + 0x8de5
0xe2c09282: /lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2 + 0x9282
0xe2c0cbf3: /lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2 + 0xcbf3
0xe2c123a2: /lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2 + 0x123a2
0xae8255f1: /usr/lib64/openoffice.org2.0/program/libvclplug_gen680lx.so + 0x5b5f1
0xe6806d48: /usr/lib64/libSM.so.6 + 0x6d48 (_SmcProcessMessage + 0xd78)
0xe6c11ffb: /usr/lib64/libICE.so.6 + 0x11ffb (IceProcessMessages + 0x38b)
0xae8245c6: /usr/lib64/openoffice.org2.0/program/libvclplug_gen680lx.so + 0x5a5c6
0xeca2e527: /usr/lib64/openoffice.org2.0/program/libuno_sal.so.3 + 0x2e527
0xe3c06305: /lib64/libpthread.so.0 + 0x6305
0xe30cd50d: /lib64/libc.so.6 + 0xcd50d (clone + 0x6d)
...end stackreport details ...
...start sample ldd details ...
	libuno_sal.so.3 => /usr/lib64/openoffice.org2.0/program/libuno_sal.so.3
(0x00002aaaaaccd000)
	libuno_salhelpergcc3.so.3 =>
/usr/lib64/openoffice.org2.0/program/libuno_salhelpergcc3.so.3 (0x00002aaaab0c2000)
	libstore.so.3 => /usr/lib64/openoffice.org2.0/program/libstore.so.3
(0x00002aaaab2c6000)
	libdl.so.2 => /lib64/libdl.so.2 (0x00002aaaab4ff000)
	libpthread.so.0 => /lib64/libpthread.so.0 (0x00002aaaab703000)
	libstlport_gcc.so => /usr/lib64/openoffice.org2.0/program/libstlport_gcc.so
(0x00002aaaab91d000)
	libstdc++.so.6 => /usr/lib64/libstdc++.so.6 (0x00002aaaabbf7000)
	libm.so.6 => /lib64/libm.so.6 (0x00002aaaabef7000)
	libgcc_s.so.1 => /lib64/libgcc_s.so.1 (0x00002aaaac17a000)
	libc.so.6 => /lib64/libc.so.6 (0x00002aaaac388000)
	libcrypt.so.1 => /lib64/libcrypt.so.1 (0x00002aaaac6d6000)
	/lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2 (0x0000555555554000)
...end sample ldd details ...

Comment 1 Caolan McNamara 2007-02-02 09:02:57 UTC


*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 210748 ***

Comment 2 Caolan McNamara 2007-03-12 19:53:56 UTC

*** Bug 231873 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 3 Caolan McNamara 2007-04-24 06:29:23 UTC

*** Bug 236671 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 4 Gilboa Davara 2007-05-18 21:28:18 UTC

What's the use of marking the bug as duplicate, if we are not allowed to view
the original?

FYI, I'm getting the same (?) crash. 
Started yesterday, no idea why/how.

No pre-link errors, I'll post the debuginfo trace later... (just to have it
marked as duplicate of 210748... Aye!)

- Gilboa

Comment 5 Gilboa Davara 2007-05-18 21:30:06 UTC

Oh... Didn't mean to sound so harsh.
I just find the situation... a bit... err.... weird?