Bug 2277263

Summary:	Please branch and build easyloggingpp in epel8
Product:	[Fedora] Fedora EPEL	Reporter:	Michel Lind <michel>
Component:	easyloggingpp	Assignee:	Ben Beasley <code>
Status:	CLOSED ERRATA	QA Contact:
Severity:	unspecified	Docs Contact:
Priority:	unspecified
Version:	epel8	CC:	code, neuro-sig
Target Milestone:	---
Target Release:	---
Hardware:	Unspecified
OS:	Unspecified
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:	easyloggingpp-9.97.1-6.el8	Doc Type:	If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:
Last Closed:	2024-05-02 02:32:48 UTC	Type:	---
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On:
Bug Blocks:	1914423

Description Michel Lind 2024-04-26 03:20:19 UTC

Please branch and build easyloggingpp in epel8.

If you do not wish to maintain easyloggingpp in epel8,
or do not think you will be able to do this in a timely manner,
the EPEL Packagers SIG would be happy to be a co-maintainer of the package;
please add the epel-packagers-sig group through
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/easyloggingpp/addgroup
and grant it commit access, or collaborator access on epel* branches.

I would also be happy to be a co-maintainer (FAS: salimma);
please add me through https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/easyloggingpp/adduser

Comment 1 Ben Beasley 2024-04-26 11:55:30 UTC

It looks like I had done the necessary backporting work in a branch when I imported the package,

https://src.fedoraproject.org/fork/music/rpms/easyloggingpp/c/996597b5881bb723572f0a95d50ee0a6c4b17245?branch=epel8test

but never requested an EPEL8 branch. I don’t remember why. Maybe there was a problem with the build that was resolved by a point release of RHEL8. Maybe I just forgot.

Anyway, this appears to be viable for EPEL8, so I’m happy to introduce it there. Although I don’t expect much activity on this package, I’m also happy to add you as a co-maintainer.

Comment 2 Fedora Update System 2024-04-26 13:03:18 UTC

FEDORA-EPEL-2024-75e4215978 (easyloggingpp-9.97.1-6.el8) has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL 8.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2024-75e4215978

Comment 3 Fedora Update System 2024-04-27 02:29:26 UTC

FEDORA-EPEL-2024-75e4215978 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 8 testing repository.

You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2024-75e4215978

See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates.

Comment 4 Michel Lind 2024-05-01 00:20:16 UTC

(In reply to Ben Beasley from comment #1)
> It looks like I had done the necessary backporting work in a branch when I
> imported the package,
> 
> https://src.fedoraproject.org/fork/music/rpms/easyloggingpp/c/
> 996597b5881bb723572f0a95d50ee0a6c4b17245?branch=epel8test
> 
> but never requested an EPEL8 branch. I don’t remember why. Maybe there was a
> problem with the build that was resolved by a point release of RHEL8. Maybe
> I just forgot.
> 
> Anyway, this appears to be viable for EPEL8, so I’m happy to introduce it
> there. Although I don’t expect much activity on this package, I’m also happy
> to add you as a co-maintainer.

thank you! Yeah, the unbundled EternalTerminal (et) package can't be built on epel8 without easyloggingpp, and I'm trying to get it updated to the latest version to fix some CVEs. Happy to comaintain

Comment 5 Fedora Update System 2024-05-02 02:32:48 UTC

FEDORA-EPEL-2024-75e4215978 (easyloggingpp-9.97.1-6.el8) has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 8 stable repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.