Bug 2281476
| Summary: | [UI][Provider mode] Tooltips are missing on Provider mode CR creation web pages | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Red Hat Storage] Red Hat OpenShift Data Foundation | Reporter: | Daniel Osypenko <dosypenk> |
| Component: | management-console | Assignee: | Timothy Asir <tjeyasin> |
| Status: | CLOSED NOTABUG | QA Contact: | Prasad Desala <tdesala> |
| Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | medium | ||
| Version: | 4.16 | CC: | badhikar, ebenahar, odf-bz-bot, rohgupta, skatiyar, tjeyasin |
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||
| Target Release: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | Unspecified | ||
| OS: | Unspecified | ||
| Whiteboard: | isf-provider | ||
| Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | If docs needed, set a value | |
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2024-08-20 06:15:02 UTC | Type: | Bug |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
| Embargoed: | |||
|
Description
Daniel Osypenko
2024-05-19 10:06:33 UTC
The view is seen only when ODF client plugin is disabled. These tooltips are not under our control. The views of StorageClient and StorageClaim don't have tooltips when the ODF console plugin is Enabled too. (In reply to Daniel Osypenko from comment #4) > The views of StorageClient and StorageClaim don't have tooltips when the ODF > console plugin is Enabled too. Hi, was adding tooltips somehow part of epic's planning, discussions/designs and we missed adding them ?? If yes, then we might be okay. Else, this is not a bug, mostly all of the OCP/ODF "Create" pages don't have tooltips on user inputs. We should be having corresponding documentation as well. Is there a reason we want it specifically for Client UI and not at other places like in ODF etc ?? Hello Sanjal. This issue was raised in discussions between qe, dev and management because we lack information and are confused about fields such as "StorageClient.type". Additionally, this field is not explained in the Schema when we select the YAML view and the name "type" is not selfExplaining. No requirement on "Data Foundation endpoint" (which was a matter of another bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2278676), no req or explanation on Onboarding token (we need to address first-time user to ODF Provider cluster and navigate to specific web page) StorageClient.encryptionMethod, StorageClient.storageProfile fields are just text input fields. The StorageClient and StorageClaim for ODF client are similar to a StorageSystem in ODF when it comes to the deployment process. When creating a StorageSystem in ODF, we provide an explanation under each input field on the form. The lack of information when introducing a new deployment mode can deter potential customers, in contrast, we need to guide users with confidence in the deployment process. We need to resolve this issue, either with tooltips or by following the example of the StorageSystem creation process. Hello Daniel, Currently we have implemented what has been part of UX designs.And there were no tooltips proposed. We can take this bug as a RFE and move forward by asking UXD and documentation team to come up with texts for our UI. After the decision was made to remove the StorageClaim page, the existing StorageClient CR creation form, which currently has three fields (name, endpoint, onboarding token), can be improved by adding field descriptions similar to those in the StorageSystem form. not a blocker |