Bug 228356

Summary: multi-lib conflicts
Product: [Fedora] Fedora Reporter: Michael Schwendt <bugs.michael>
Component: codeblocksAssignee: Dan Horák <dan>
Status: CLOSED NEXTRELEASE QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity: medium Docs Contact:
Priority: medium    
Version: rawhide   
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: x86_64   
OS: Linux   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2007-02-13 18:08:28 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On:    
Bug Blocks: 213321    

Description Michael Schwendt 2007-02-12 19:56:24 UTC
codeblocks - 1.0-0.21.20070125svn3540.fc7.x86_64
  Conflicts: 12
  File conflict in:
     /usr/share/codeblocks/todo.zip
     /usr/share/codeblocks/autosave.zip
     /usr/share/codeblocks/start_here.zip
     /usr/share/codeblocks/manager_resources.zip
     /usr/share/codeblocks/compiler.zip
     /usr/share/codeblocks/codecompletion.zip
     /usr/share/codeblocks/resources.zip
     /usr/share/codeblocks/astyle.zip
     /usr/share/codeblocks/classwizard.zip
     /usr/share/codeblocks/defaultmimehandler.zip
     /usr/share/codeblocks/debugger.zip
     /usr/share/codeblocks/scriptedwizard.zip
  Packages with the same files:
     codeblocks - 1.0-0.21.20070125svn3540.fc7.i386

Comment 1 Dan Horák 2007-02-13 10:01:37 UTC
The zip files are generated during the build process, but on all arches they
have the same content. So as a workaround I will explicitly set their timestamp.

Comment 2 Michael Schwendt 2007-02-13 10:36:21 UTC
Does that result in the file checksums being the same on i386 and x86_64?

Is codeblocks.i386 needed on x86_64 anyway? It is only available,
because codeblocks-devel exists (a plug-in API). How about splitting
off the libraries of the main package into a codeblocks-libs package?

Comment 3 Dan Horák 2007-02-13 11:59:55 UTC
Oh, the checksums are not the same, because the source files are touched with
dos2unix. But it could be worked around.

I don't think that anybody could need codeblock.i386 on x86_64. So creating the
libs subpackage seems as good solution.

Comment 4 Dan Horák 2007-02-13 18:08:28 UTC
Created the libs subpackage, build requested (27471)