Bug 228356 - multi-lib conflicts
Summary: multi-lib conflicts
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED NEXTRELEASE
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: codeblocks
Version: rawhide
Hardware: x86_64
OS: Linux
medium
medium
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Dan Horák
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks: FE7Target
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2007-02-12 19:56 UTC by Michael Schwendt
Modified: 2007-11-30 22:11 UTC (History)
0 users

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2007-02-13 18:08:28 UTC
Type: ---
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Michael Schwendt 2007-02-12 19:56:24 UTC
codeblocks - 1.0-0.21.20070125svn3540.fc7.x86_64
  Conflicts: 12
  File conflict in:
     /usr/share/codeblocks/todo.zip
     /usr/share/codeblocks/autosave.zip
     /usr/share/codeblocks/start_here.zip
     /usr/share/codeblocks/manager_resources.zip
     /usr/share/codeblocks/compiler.zip
     /usr/share/codeblocks/codecompletion.zip
     /usr/share/codeblocks/resources.zip
     /usr/share/codeblocks/astyle.zip
     /usr/share/codeblocks/classwizard.zip
     /usr/share/codeblocks/defaultmimehandler.zip
     /usr/share/codeblocks/debugger.zip
     /usr/share/codeblocks/scriptedwizard.zip
  Packages with the same files:
     codeblocks - 1.0-0.21.20070125svn3540.fc7.i386

Comment 1 Dan Horák 2007-02-13 10:01:37 UTC
The zip files are generated during the build process, but on all arches they
have the same content. So as a workaround I will explicitly set their timestamp.

Comment 2 Michael Schwendt 2007-02-13 10:36:21 UTC
Does that result in the file checksums being the same on i386 and x86_64?

Is codeblocks.i386 needed on x86_64 anyway? It is only available,
because codeblocks-devel exists (a plug-in API). How about splitting
off the libraries of the main package into a codeblocks-libs package?

Comment 3 Dan Horák 2007-02-13 11:59:55 UTC
Oh, the checksums are not the same, because the source files are touched with
dos2unix. But it could be worked around.

I don't think that anybody could need codeblock.i386 on x86_64. So creating the
libs subpackage seems as good solution.

Comment 4 Dan Horák 2007-02-13 18:08:28 UTC
Created the libs subpackage, build requested (27471)


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.