Bug 228782

Summary: Review Request: tcl-html - HTML documentation for Tcl/Tk
Product: [Fedora] Fedora Reporter: Wart <wart>
Component: Package ReviewAssignee: Marcela Mašláňová <mmaslano>
Status: CLOSED DUPLICATE QA Contact: Fedora Package Reviews List <fedora-package-review>
Severity: medium Docs Contact:
Priority: medium    
Version: rawhideCC: mmaslano, sander
Target Milestone: ---Keywords: Reopened
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: All   
OS: Linux   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2008-01-11 22:55:49 EST Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: ---
Bug Depends On: 226479    
Bug Blocks: 201449    

Description Wart 2007-02-14 17:44:01 EST
Spec URL: http://www.kobold.org/~wart/fedora/tcl-html.spec
SRPM URL: http://www.kobold.org/~wart/fedora/tcl-html-8.4.13-10.src.rpm
Description: 
HTML man pages for the Tcl/Tk script and C level APIs.

This package is being moved out of the core tcl package so that it can be made noarch, and because there are no more build-time dependencies between tcl and tcl-html.

The initial build/push of this package will need to be coordinated with the main tcl package to prevent both arch and noarch versions from appearing in the repo.  Similarly, the initial release number for this package must be greater than the last release number for the current tcl-html subpackage in order for upgrades to work.
Comment 1 Sander Hoentjen 2007-02-15 01:50:55 EST
(In reply to comment #0)
> Similarly, the initial release number for this package must be greater than
the last release number for the current tcl-html subpackage in order for
upgrades to work.

Meaning either the tcl package drops Epoch (which i prefer) or this package also
adds the Epoch, if I am not mistaken.
Comment 2 Marcela Mašláňová 2007-02-15 10:08:34 EST
related #226479
Is it really necessary to split it into 2 packages?
Comment 3 Wart 2007-02-15 15:16:36 EST
Also noted in the related bug:

It is strongly encouraged because it will:
* simplify the tcl spec file
* make the tcl src rpm smaller
* prevent needless updates to the -html package whenever tcl is rebuilt
* shorten the build time for the tcl package since the -html subpackage
  won't be rebuilt
* allow the -html package to be properly tagged as 'noarch'
Comment 4 Marcela Mašláňová 2007-02-21 08:03:03 EST
These are nice arguments, but many packages have documentation included in one
package. I don't want split them now.
Comment 5 Marcela Mašláňová 2007-12-21 03:50:58 EST
Reopen, fix this problem for tcl-8.5.0
Comment 6 Wart 2008-01-11 22:55:49 EST

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 427264 ***