Bug 228782

Summary:	Review Request: tcl-html - HTML documentation for Tcl/Tk
Product:	[Fedora] Fedora	Reporter:	Wart <wart>
Component:	Package Review	Assignee:	Marcela Mašláňová <mmaslano>
Status:	CLOSED DUPLICATE	QA Contact:	Fedora Package Reviews List <fedora-package-review>
Severity:	medium	Docs Contact:
Priority:	medium
Version:	rawhide	CC:	mmaslano, sander
Target Milestone:	---	Keywords:	Reopened
Target Release:	---
Hardware:	All
OS:	Linux
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:		Doc Type:	Bug Fix
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:
Last Closed:	2008-01-12 03:55:49 UTC	Type:	---
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On:	226479
Bug Blocks:	201449

Description Wart 2007-02-14 22:44:01 UTC

Spec URL: http://www.kobold.org/~wart/fedora/tcl-html.spec
SRPM URL: http://www.kobold.org/~wart/fedora/tcl-html-8.4.13-10.src.rpm
Description: 
HTML man pages for the Tcl/Tk script and C level APIs.

This package is being moved out of the core tcl package so that it can be made noarch, and because there are no more build-time dependencies between tcl and tcl-html.

The initial build/push of this package will need to be coordinated with the main tcl package to prevent both arch and noarch versions from appearing in the repo.  Similarly, the initial release number for this package must be greater than the last release number for the current tcl-html subpackage in order for upgrades to work.

Comment 1 Sander Hoentjen 2007-02-15 06:50:55 UTC

(In reply to comment #0)
> Similarly, the initial release number for this package must be greater than
the last release number for the current tcl-html subpackage in order for
upgrades to work.

Meaning either the tcl package drops Epoch (which i prefer) or this package also
adds the Epoch, if I am not mistaken.

Comment 2 Marcela Mašláňová 2007-02-15 15:08:34 UTC

related #226479
Is it really necessary to split it into 2 packages?

Comment 3 Wart 2007-02-15 20:16:36 UTC

Also noted in the related bug:

It is strongly encouraged because it will:
* simplify the tcl spec file
* make the tcl src rpm smaller
* prevent needless updates to the -html package whenever tcl is rebuilt
* shorten the build time for the tcl package since the -html subpackage
  won't be rebuilt
* allow the -html package to be properly tagged as 'noarch'

Comment 4 Marcela Mašláňová 2007-02-21 13:03:03 UTC

These are nice arguments, but many packages have documentation included in one
package. I don't want split them now.

Comment 5 Marcela Mašláňová 2007-12-21 08:50:58 UTC

Reopen, fix this problem for tcl-8.5.0

Comment 6 Wart 2008-01-12 03:55:49 UTC


*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 427264 ***