Bug 2293755
| Summary: | Review Request: golang-github-charlievieth-fastwalk - Fast parallel directory traversal for Golang | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Elliott Sales de Andrade <quantum.analyst> |
| Component: | Package Review | Assignee: | Mikel Olasagasti Uranga <mikel> |
| Status: | CLOSED ERRATA | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
| Severity: | unspecified | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | unspecified | ||
| Version: | rawhide | CC: | mikel, package-review |
| Target Milestone: | --- | Keywords: | AutomationTriaged |
| Target Release: | --- | Flags: | mikel:
fedora-review+
|
| Hardware: | Unspecified | ||
| OS: | Unspecified | ||
| URL: | https://github.com/charlievieth/fastwalk | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | golang-github-charlievieth-fastwalk-1.0.4-1.fc41 | Doc Type: | If docs needed, set a value |
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2024-06-30 20:47:27 UTC | Type: | --- |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
| Embargoed: | |||
| Bug Depends On: | |||
| Bug Blocks: | 2256379 | ||
|
Description
Elliott Sales de Andrade
2024-06-22 07:26:36 UTC
Copr build: https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/build/7650157 (succeeded) Review template: https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/@fedora-review/fedora-review-2293755-golang-github-charlievieth-fastwalk/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/07650157-golang-github-charlievieth-fastwalk/fedora-review/review.txt Please take a look if any issues were found. --- This comment was created by the fedora-review-service https://github.com/FrostyX/fedora-review-service If you want to trigger a new Copr build, add a comment containing new Spec and SRPM URLs or [fedora-review-service-build] string. spec is correct, but I've one question: > %bcond check 1 go2rpm template uses bcond_without and has done it since the beginning: https://gitlab.com/fedora/sigs/go/go2rpm/-/blob/main/go2rpm/templates/profile2.spec?ref_type=heads&blame=1#L2 Is there a reason to change it? I find this style to be clearer (it says what it is, not what it isn't), and it's available on all Fedora. I don't know about EPEL though. But we should probably change it in the template as well. Eclipseo is proposing similar template change in https://gitlab.com/fedora/sigs/go/go2rpm/-/merge_requests/13 so I guess we'll end adopting it. This package was generated using go2rpm, which simplifies the review. Legend: [x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated - [x] The latest version is packaged or packaging an earlier version is justified. - [x] The License tag reflects the package contents and uses the correct identifiers. - [x] The package builds successfully in mock. - [x] Package is installable (checked by fedora-review). - [x] There are no relevant rpmlint errors. - [x] The package runs tests in %check. - [x] `%goipath` is set correctly. - [-] The package's binaries don't conflict with binaries already in the distribution. (Some Go projects include utility binaries with very generic names) - [-] There are no `%{_bindir}/*` wildcards in %files. (go2rpm includes these by default) - [x] The package does not use `%gometa -f` if it has dependents that still build for %ix86. - [x] The package complies with the Golang and general Packaging Guidelines. Package approved! On import, don't forget to do the following: - [ ] Add the package to release-monitoring.org - [ ] Give go-sig privileges (at least commit) on the package - [ ] Close the review bug by referencing its ID in the rpm changelog and the Bodhi ticket. - [ ] Consider configuring Packit service to help with maintenance Thanks! Thank you for the review, Mikel The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/golang-github-charlievieth-fastwalk FEDORA-2024-4ddca6fe36 (golang-github-charlievieth-fastwalk-1.0.4-1.fc41) has been submitted as an update to Fedora 41. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2024-4ddca6fe36 FEDORA-2024-4ddca6fe36 (golang-github-charlievieth-fastwalk-1.0.4-1.fc41) has been pushed to the Fedora 41 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report. FEDORA-2024-7d3cf57455 (fzf-0.53.0-1.fc39, golang-github-charlievieth-fastwalk-1.0.4-1.fc39, and 2 more) has been submitted as an update to Fedora 39. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2024-7d3cf57455 FEDORA-2024-9f26b3eb12 (fzf-0.53.0-1.fc40, golang-github-charlievieth-fastwalk-1.0.4-1.fc40, and 2 more) has been submitted as an update to Fedora 40. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2024-9f26b3eb12 FEDORA-2024-7d3cf57455 has been pushed to the Fedora 39 testing repository. Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command: `sudo dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing --refresh --advisory=FEDORA-2024-7d3cf57455` You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2024-7d3cf57455 See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates. FEDORA-2024-9f26b3eb12 has been pushed to the Fedora 40 testing repository. Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command: `sudo dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing --refresh --advisory=FEDORA-2024-9f26b3eb12` You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2024-9f26b3eb12 See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates. FEDORA-2024-9f26b3eb12 (fzf-0.53.0-1.fc40, golang-github-charlievieth-fastwalk-1.0.4-1.fc40, and 2 more) has been pushed to the Fedora 40 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report. FEDORA-2024-7d3cf57455 (fzf-0.53.0-1.fc39, golang-github-charlievieth-fastwalk-1.0.4-1.fc39, and 2 more) has been pushed to the Fedora 39 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report. |