Bug 2295134 (rust-cidr)

Summary: Review Request: rust-cidr - IP network and IP host within network types
Product: [Fedora] Fedora Reporter: Paul Pfeister <redhat>
Component: Package ReviewAssignee: Fabio Valentini <decathorpe>
Status: CLOSED ERRATA QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity: medium Docs Contact:
Priority: medium    
Version: rawhideCC: decathorpe, package-review
Target Milestone: ---Keywords: AutomationTriaged
Target Release: ---Flags: decathorpe: fedora-review+
Hardware: All   
OS: Linux   
URL: https://crates.io/crates/cidr
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2024-07-03 21:38:27 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On:    
Bug Blocks: 2295136    

Description Paul Pfeister 2024-07-02 07:04:21 UTC
Spec URL: https://raw.githubusercontent.com/ppfeister/pkg/master/rust-cidr.spec
SRPM URL: https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/ppfeister/RustScan/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/07697726-rust-cidr/rust-cidr-0.2.3-1.fc41.src.rpm

Description: This library provides types to represent an IP network (Cidr) or an IP host withing a network (Inet)

Fedora Account System Username: ppfeister

Please confirm that I have handled extras correctly.

Comment 1 Fedora Review Service 2024-07-02 07:17:09 UTC
Copr build:
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/build/7697772
(succeeded)

Review template:
https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/@fedora-review/fedora-review-2295134-rust-cidr/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/07697772-rust-cidr/fedora-review/review.txt

Please take a look if any issues were found.


---
This comment was created by the fedora-review-service
https://github.com/FrostyX/fedora-review-service

If you want to trigger a new Copr build, add a comment containing new
Spec and SRPM URLs or [fedora-review-service-build] string.

Comment 2 Fabio Valentini 2024-07-03 17:20:52 UTC
Can you clarify what you mean by "extras"? That term doesn't mean anything wrt/ Rust packages.

However, package looks good to me.

===


Package was generated with rust2rpm, simplifying the review.

✅ package contains only permissible content
✅ package builds and installs without errors on rawhide
✅ test suite is run and all unit tests pass
✅ latest version of the crate is packaged
✅ license matches upstream specification and is acceptable for Fedora
✅ license file is included with %license in %files
✅ package complies with Rust Packaging Guidelines

Package APPROVED.

===

Recommended post-import rust-sig tasks:

- set up package on release-monitoring.org:
  project: $crate
  homepage: https://crates.io/crates/$crate
  backend: crates.io
  version scheme: semantic
  version filter: alpha;beta;rc;pre
  distro: Fedora
  Package: rust-$crate

- add @rust-sig with "commit" access as package co-maintainer
  (should happen automatically)

- set bugzilla assignee overrides to @rust-sig (optional)

- track package in koschei for all built branches
  (should happen automatically once rust-sig is co-maintainer)

Comment 3 Fedora Admin user for bugzilla script actions 2024-07-03 19:31:41 UTC
The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/rust-cidr

Comment 4 Paul Pfeister 2024-07-03 21:01:30 UTC
"extras" meaning +xyz
such as in this case, rust-cidr+bitstring-devel
But it seems like we're good to go with those!

Created according to recommended tasks. Thanks for review!

Comment 5 Fedora Update System 2024-07-03 21:35:38 UTC
FEDORA-2024-ad7671890f (rust-cidr-0.2.3-2.fc41) has been submitted as an update to Fedora 41.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2024-ad7671890f

Comment 6 Fedora Update System 2024-07-03 21:38:27 UTC
FEDORA-2024-ad7671890f (rust-cidr-0.2.3-2.fc41) has been pushed to the Fedora 41 stable repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.

Comment 7 Fabio Valentini 2024-07-04 10:41:36 UTC
Sorry - looks like I messed up the check for the package installability. Not sure how ... but I see you already opened a review request for the "bitstring" crate.

Comment 8 Paul Pfeister 2024-07-04 18:28:15 UTC
The fact that bitstring an _optional_ (and unused) dependency is what screwed up my own testing. This is something that I've added to my _list of things to look out for_ in later packages.