Bug 229732

Summary: LSPP: pfkey_delete and xfrm_del_sa audit hook is misplaced.
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5 Reporter: Eric Paris <eparis>
Component: kernelAssignee: Eric Paris <eparis>
Status: CLOSED ERRATA QA Contact: Brian Brock <bbrock>
Severity: medium Docs Contact:
Priority: medium    
Version: 5.0CC: dzickus, iboverma, sgrubb
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: All   
OS: Linux   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: RHBA-2007-0959 Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2007-11-07 19:41:28 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On:    
Bug Blocks: 224041    

Description Eric Paris 2007-02-23 00:05:59 UTC
The audit hook in pfkey_delete will not notice nor audit any SA deletions denied
by security policy.

Comment 1 Eric Paris 2007-02-23 00:12:58 UTC
xfrm_del_sa is the same way.   broken in RHEL5 and upstream

Comment 4 Eric Paris 2007-03-06 21:38:53 UTC
needs verification from joy lattern.  also needs acceptance into an upstream tree:

http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-kernel&m=117286663919504&w=2

Comment 5 Eric Paris 2007-03-23 17:48:06 UTC
in at least 2.6.21-rc4 verified by joy latten of ibm.  ready for internal
submission removing from LSPP tracker list.

Comment 8 Don Zickus 2007-06-16 00:31:24 UTC
in 2.6.18-27.el5
You can download this test kernel from http://people.redhat.com/dzickus/el5

Comment 10 Mike Gahagan 2007-09-12 21:46:39 UTC
confirmed fix is in the -46 kernel.


Comment 12 errata-xmlrpc 2007-11-07 19:41:28 UTC
An advisory has been issued which should help the problem
described in this bug report. This report is therefore being
closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For more information
on the solution and/or where to find the updated files,
please follow the link below. You may reopen this bug report
if the solution does not work for you.

http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2007-0959.html