Bug 229732 - LSPP: pfkey_delete and xfrm_del_sa audit hook is misplaced.
LSPP: pfkey_delete and xfrm_del_sa audit hook is misplaced.
Status: CLOSED ERRATA
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5
Classification: Red Hat
Component: kernel (Show other bugs)
5.0
All Linux
medium Severity medium
: ---
: ---
Assigned To: Eric Paris
Brian Brock
:
Depends On:
Blocks: RHEL5LSPPCertTracker
  Show dependency treegraph
 
Reported: 2007-02-22 19:05 EST by Eric Paris
Modified: 2007-11-30 17:07 EST (History)
3 users (show)

See Also:
Fixed In Version: RHBA-2007-0959
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2007-11-07 14:41:28 EST
Type: ---
Regression: ---
Mount Type: ---
Documentation: ---
CRM:
Verified Versions:
Category: ---
oVirt Team: ---
RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: ---


Attachments (Terms of Use)

  None (edit)
Description Eric Paris 2007-02-22 19:05:59 EST
The audit hook in pfkey_delete will not notice nor audit any SA deletions denied
by security policy.
Comment 1 Eric Paris 2007-02-22 19:12:58 EST
xfrm_del_sa is the same way.   broken in RHEL5 and upstream
Comment 4 Eric Paris 2007-03-06 16:38:53 EST
needs verification from joy lattern.  also needs acceptance into an upstream tree:

http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-kernel&m=117286663919504&w=2
Comment 5 Eric Paris 2007-03-23 13:48:06 EDT
in at least 2.6.21-rc4 verified by joy latten of ibm.  ready for internal
submission removing from LSPP tracker list.
Comment 8 Don Zickus 2007-06-15 20:31:24 EDT
in 2.6.18-27.el5
You can download this test kernel from http://people.redhat.com/dzickus/el5
Comment 10 Mike Gahagan 2007-09-12 17:46:39 EDT
confirmed fix is in the -46 kernel.
Comment 12 errata-xmlrpc 2007-11-07 14:41:28 EST
An advisory has been issued which should help the problem
described in this bug report. This report is therefore being
closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For more information
on the solution and/or where to find the updated files,
please follow the link below. You may reopen this bug report
if the solution does not work for you.

http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2007-0959.html

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.