Bug 2304180

Summary:	Please branch and build btrfs-progs in epel9
Product:	[Fedora] Fedora	Reporter:	Michel Lind <michel>
Component:	btrfs-progs	Assignee:	Michel Lind <michel>
Status:	CLOSED ERRATA	QA Contact:	Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity:	unspecified	Docs Contact:
Priority:	unspecified
Version:	rawhide	CC:	bugzilla, davide, esandeen, igor.raits, josef, michel, ngompa13
Target Milestone:	---
Target Release:	---
Hardware:	Unspecified
OS:	Unspecified
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:	btrfs-progs-6.10-1.el9	Doc Type:	If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:
Last Closed:	2024-08-22 01:59:28 UTC	Type:	---
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On:
Bug Blocks:	1914423, 2304179

Description Michel Lind 2024-08-12 18:02:50 UTC

Please branch and build btrfs-progs in epel9.

If you do not wish to maintain btrfs-progs in epel9,
or do not think you will be able to do this in a timely manner,
the EPEL Packagers SIG would be happy to be a co-maintainer of the package;
please add the epel-packagers-sig group through
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/btrfs-progs/addgroup
and grant it commit access, or collaborator access on epel* branches.

I would also be happy to be a co-maintainer (FAS: salimma);
please add me through https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/btrfs-progs/adduser

Comment 1 Eric Sandeen 2024-08-12 18:07:52 UTC

While I have no objection to btrfs-progs userspace in EPEL9, to what end? There is no btrfs.ko kernel driver supplied with RHEL9, and EPEL does not allow kernel kmod rpms as far as I know.

Thanks,
-Eric

Comment 2 Fedora Update System 2024-08-13 02:41:37 UTC

FEDORA-EPEL-2024-3ea33a8307 (btrfs-fuse-0-15.20230119git812c4b7.el9 and btrfs-progs-6.10-1.el9) has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL 9.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2024-3ea33a8307

Comment 3 Michel Lind 2024-08-13 14:50:05 UTC

(In reply to Eric Sandeen from comment #1)
> While I have no objection to btrfs-progs userspace in EPEL9, to what end?
> There is no btrfs.ko kernel driver supplied with RHEL9, and EPEL does not
> allow kernel kmod rpms as far as I know.
> 
> Thanks,
> -Eric

Hi Eric!

It's for btrfs-fuse - which does not need the kernel module - https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2304179 - as well as potentially for containerd, which depends on btrfs-progs (though ideally I'll try to see if that can be built with btrfs support turned off)

Thanks,

Michel

Comment 4 Eric Sandeen 2024-08-13 17:10:12 UTC

Ah, makes sense. Thanks!

Comment 5 Fedora Update System 2024-08-14 01:59:36 UTC

FEDORA-EPEL-2024-3ea33a8307 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 9 testing repository.

You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2024-3ea33a8307

See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates.

Comment 6 Fedora Update System 2024-08-22 01:59:28 UTC

FEDORA-EPEL-2024-3ea33a8307 (btrfs-fuse-0-15.20230119git812c4b7.el9 and btrfs-progs-6.10-1.el9) has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 9 stable repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.