Bug 2318269

Summary:	Please branch and build mxml in epel10
Product:	[Fedora] Fedora EPEL	Reporter:	Davide Cavalca <davide>
Component:	mxml	Assignee:	Davide Cavalca <davide>
Status:	CLOSED ERRATA	QA Contact:	Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity:	unspecified	Docs Contact:
Priority:	unspecified
Version:	epel10	CC:	carl, green, kevin, stuart
Target Milestone:	---
Target Release:	---
Hardware:	Unspecified
OS:	Unspecified
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:	mxml-3.3.1-8.el10_1	Doc Type:	If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:
Last Closed:	2025-03-06 02:41:32 UTC	Type:	---
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On:
Bug Blocks:	1914423, 2318267, 2325346

Description Davide Cavalca 2024-10-12 02:35:34 UTC

Please branch and build mxml in epel10.

If you do not wish to maintain mxml in epel10,
or do not think you will be able to do this in a timely manner,
the EPEL Packagers SIG would be happy to be a co-maintainer of the package;
please add the epel-packagers-sig group through
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/mxml/addgroup
and grant it commit access, or collaborator access on epel* branches.

Comment 1 Davide Cavalca 2024-10-23 21:19:58 UTC

Will you be able to branch and build mxml in epel10?
The EPEL Packagers SIG would be happy to be a co-maintainer
if you do not wish to build it on epel10.

Comment 2 Kevin Fenzi 2024-10-28 15:59:38 UTC

I would very much like to move to mxml 4.0.x before merging into epel10.

I have a spec/build for that for rawhide, but I haven't had time yet to test dependent packages. It's a pretty big upgrade (new soname, things changing from mxml to mxml4, etc). If someone would like to help out with impact that would be great. Otherwise I will try and do so as time permits.

Comment 3 Kevin Fenzi 2024-11-07 23:11:07 UTC

So, two things:

I am orphaning mxml. I don't have time or interest for it, so you can take it. 

But also... I looked and while Carla Buildrequires mxml, it doesn't seem like it uses it? Or I could be missing something...

Comment 4 Fedora Admin user for bugzilla script actions 2024-11-08 01:43:39 UTC

This package has changed maintainer in Fedora. Reassigning to the new maintainer of this component.

Comment 5 Fedora Update System 2025-03-04 06:18:55 UTC

FEDORA-EPEL-2025-aa341f0d2d (mxml-3.3.1-8.el10_1) has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL 10.1.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2025-aa341f0d2d

Comment 6 Davide Cavalca 2025-03-04 06:24:31 UTC

I've branched v3 for EPEL 10 now, thanks to Carl's help cleaning up the spec. For v4, the plan is to make a v3 compat package, update everything that currently BRs mxml-devel to use it, and then update this package to v4 in rawhide.

Comment 7 Fedora Update System 2025-03-05 03:10:28 UTC

FEDORA-EPEL-2025-aa341f0d2d has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 10.1 testing repository.

You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2025-aa341f0d2d

See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates.

Comment 8 Fedora Update System 2025-03-06 02:41:32 UTC

FEDORA-EPEL-2025-aa341f0d2d (mxml-3.3.1-8.el10_1) has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 10.1 stable repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.