Bug 2318269 - Please branch and build mxml in epel10
Summary: Please branch and build mxml in epel10
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED ERRATA
Alias: None
Product: Fedora EPEL
Classification: Fedora
Component: mxml
Version: epel10
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
unspecified
unspecified
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Davide Cavalca
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks: EPELPackagersSIG 2318267 2325346
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2024-10-12 02:35 UTC by Davide Cavalca
Modified: 2025-03-06 02:41 UTC (History)
4 users (show)

Fixed In Version: mxml-3.3.1-8.el10_1
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2025-03-06 02:41:32 UTC
Type: ---
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Davide Cavalca 2024-10-12 02:35:34 UTC
Please branch and build mxml in epel10.

If you do not wish to maintain mxml in epel10,
or do not think you will be able to do this in a timely manner,
the EPEL Packagers SIG would be happy to be a co-maintainer of the package;
please add the epel-packagers-sig group through
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/mxml/addgroup
and grant it commit access, or collaborator access on epel* branches.

Comment 1 Davide Cavalca 2024-10-23 21:19:58 UTC
Will you be able to branch and build mxml in epel10?
The EPEL Packagers SIG would be happy to be a co-maintainer
if you do not wish to build it on epel10.

Comment 2 Kevin Fenzi 2024-10-28 15:59:38 UTC
I would very much like to move to mxml 4.0.x before merging into epel10.

I have a spec/build for that for rawhide, but I haven't had time yet to test dependent packages. It's a pretty big upgrade (new soname, things changing from mxml to mxml4, etc). If someone would like to help out with impact that would be great. Otherwise I will try and do so as time permits.

Comment 3 Kevin Fenzi 2024-11-07 23:11:07 UTC
So, two things:

I am orphaning mxml. I don't have time or interest for it, so you can take it. 

But also... I looked and while Carla Buildrequires mxml, it doesn't seem like it uses it? Or I could be missing something...

Comment 4 Fedora Admin user for bugzilla script actions 2024-11-08 01:43:39 UTC
This package has changed maintainer in Fedora. Reassigning to the new maintainer of this component.

Comment 5 Fedora Update System 2025-03-04 06:18:55 UTC
FEDORA-EPEL-2025-aa341f0d2d (mxml-3.3.1-8.el10_1) has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL 10.1.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2025-aa341f0d2d

Comment 6 Davide Cavalca 2025-03-04 06:24:31 UTC
I've branched v3 for EPEL 10 now, thanks to Carl's help cleaning up the spec. For v4, the plan is to make a v3 compat package, update everything that currently BRs mxml-devel to use it, and then update this package to v4 in rawhide.

Comment 7 Fedora Update System 2025-03-05 03:10:28 UTC
FEDORA-EPEL-2025-aa341f0d2d has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 10.1 testing repository.

You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2025-aa341f0d2d

See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates.

Comment 8 Fedora Update System 2025-03-06 02:41:32 UTC
FEDORA-EPEL-2025-aa341f0d2d (mxml-3.3.1-8.el10_1) has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 10.1 stable repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.