Bug 231900
| Summary: | obsoletes handling doesn't account for arch | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Nalin Dahyabhai <nalin> |
| Component: | yum | Assignee: | Jeremy Katz <katzj> |
| Status: | CLOSED DUPLICATE | QA Contact: | |
| Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | medium | ||
| Version: | rawhide | ||
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||
| Target Release: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | All | ||
| OS: | Linux | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2007-04-25 19:24:36 UTC | Type: | --- |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
| Embargoed: | |||
| Bug Depends On: | |||
| Bug Blocks: | 150226 | ||
This has come up before and I think the actual behavior has flip-flopped over time... given that the obsolete doesn't specify an arch (it can't really), what the "right" thing to do is hard to say. By installing both arches, it's consistent with if you just did the install... but not with an update. I guess it probably makes more sense to follow the update path. |
Attempting to update to a recent Raw Hide snapshot, I see this: Dependencies Resolved ============================================================================= Package Arch Version Repository Size ============================================================================= Installing: nautilus-sendto i386 0.10-1.fc7 development 79 k replacing nautilus-sendto-bluetooth.x86_64 0.8-4.fc7 nautilus-sendto x86_64 0.10-1.fc7 development 82 k replacing nautilus-sendto-bluetooth.x86_64 0.8-4.fc7 I don't have the i386 nautilus-sendto-bluetooth installed, so installing the i386 nautilus-sendto seems kinda wrong.