Bug 231900 - obsoletes handling doesn't account for arch
obsoletes handling doesn't account for arch
Status: CLOSED DUPLICATE of bug 200643
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: yum (Show other bugs)
rawhide
All Linux
medium Severity medium
: ---
: ---
Assigned To: Jeremy Katz
:
Depends On:
Blocks: FC7Blocker
  Show dependency treegraph
 
Reported: 2007-03-12 17:04 EDT by Nalin Dahyabhai
Modified: 2014-01-21 17:57 EST (History)
0 users

See Also:
Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2007-04-25 15:24:36 EDT
Type: ---
Regression: ---
Mount Type: ---
Documentation: ---
CRM:
Verified Versions:
Category: ---
oVirt Team: ---
RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: ---


Attachments (Terms of Use)

  None (edit)
Description Nalin Dahyabhai 2007-03-12 17:04:19 EDT
Attempting to update to a recent Raw Hide snapshot, I see this:

Dependencies Resolved

=============================================================================
 Package                 Arch       Version          Repository        Size 
=============================================================================
Installing:
 nautilus-sendto         i386       0.10-1.fc7       development        79 k
     replacing  nautilus-sendto-bluetooth.x86_64 0.8-4.fc7

 nautilus-sendto         x86_64     0.10-1.fc7       development        82 k
     replacing  nautilus-sendto-bluetooth.x86_64 0.8-4.fc7

I don't have the i386 nautilus-sendto-bluetooth installed, so installing the
i386 nautilus-sendto seems kinda wrong.
Comment 1 Jeremy Katz 2007-03-19 18:00:29 EDT
This has come up before and I think the actual behavior has flip-flopped over
time...  given that the obsolete doesn't specify an arch (it can't really), what
the "right" thing to do is hard to say.  By installing both arches, it's
consistent with if you just did the install... but not with an update.  I guess
it probably makes more sense to follow the update path.
Comment 2 Jeremy Katz 2007-04-25 15:24:36 EDT

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 200643 ***

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.