Bug 232176
| Summary: | add Tibetan Support group | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Jens Petersen <petersen> | ||||
| Component: | comps | Assignee: | David Cantrell <dcantrell> | ||||
| Status: | CLOSED RAWHIDE | QA Contact: | |||||
| Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |||||
| Priority: | medium | ||||||
| Version: | rawhide | CC: | eng-i18n-bugs, mgarski | ||||
| Target Milestone: | --- | Keywords: | i18n | ||||
| Target Release: | --- | ||||||
| Hardware: | All | ||||||
| OS: | Linux | ||||||
| Whiteboard: | |||||||
| Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |||||
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |||||
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||||||
| Last Closed: | 2007-04-10 20:29:02 UTC | Type: | --- | ||||
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- | ||||
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |||||
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |||||
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |||||
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |||||
| Embargoed: | |||||||
| Bug Depends On: | |||||||
| Bug Blocks: | 167536 | ||||||
| Attachments: |
|
||||||
|
Description
Jens Petersen
2007-03-14 03:32:54 UTC
Created attachment 150021 [details]
comps-f7-tibetan.patch
Added to comps. Thanks! Jens do you think that we should also add jomolhari-fonts as mandatory package next to tibetan-machine-uni-fonts? Good question. Maybe I think we can make it default or optional since it is more Bhutanese in style. Perhaps we should also add a language group for Bhutanese - the only problem is that current we don't have an m17n-db map for it, can the bo-wylie.mim be used to input Dzongkha probably not? I would like to stick with those two fonts in Tibetan and also in Bhutanese language group. As Chris wrote TMU is "more legible on screen at smaller sizes" and "Jomolhari is generally a better choice in documents designed for print" and as I understood they can be used both by Bhutanese and Tibetans. Why not to use X11/xkb/symbols/bt? As it is a "Dzongkha layout for Bhutanese keyboard", besides we have also dz_BT.utf8 locale and dz_BT langpack for OO.org (which is missing in Fedora). But Bhutanese support stuff should probably move to new bug report :) (In reply to comment #5) > I would like to stick with those two fonts in Tibetan and also in Bhutanese > language group. Fine. With "default" there is still the option to select/deselect it in the package manager. > As Chris wrote TMU is "more legible on screen at smaller sizes" > and "Jomolhari is generally a better choice in documents designed for print" > and as I understood they can be used both by Bhutanese and Tibetans. Yep. Which font will be used when they share the same glyph? > Why not to use X11/xkb/symbols/bt? As it is a "Dzongkha layout for Bhutanese > keyboard", besides we have also dz_BT.utf8 locale and dz_BT langpack for OO.org > (which is missing in Fedora). Okay, that would work. In the longer turn it would be nice to have m17n-db map too for people who like to do multilingual input. We usually write utf8 locale with ".UTF-8". > But Bhutanese support stuff should probably move to new bug report :) Yup, it should. 236383(In reply to comment #6) > Fine. With "default" there is still the option to select/deselect > it in the package manager. Great! > Yep. Which font will be used when they share the same glyph? Good point. I assume Fontconfig performs fonts matching. I will need to read man pages and documentation to find the answer. > Okay, that would work. In the longer turn it would be nice to have m17n-db > map too for people who like to do multilingual input. We usually write utf8 > locale with ".UTF-8". I wrote ".utf8" because "locale -a | grep dz" have returned me such match. > > But Bhutanese support stuff should probably move to new bug report :) > > Yup, it should. Your wish is my command :) Bug #236383 - Dzongkha (Bhutan) support |